Cited by 206Phonetics and Phonology ResearchCategorization, perception, and languageNeuroscience and Music Perception

Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum

Open access
Pisoni, David B., Lazarus, Joan House·1974·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Native speakers of English identified and then discriminated between stimuli which varied in voice onset time (VOT). One group of listeners identified a randomized sequence of stimuli; another group identified an ordered sequence of stimuli, in which stimuli from the VOT continuum were presented in a consecutive order. Half of the Ss in each group then received one of two discrimination formats: the ABX discrimination test in which X was identified with A or with B, or 4IAX test of paired similarity in which two pairs of stimuli—one pair always the same and one pair always different—were presented on each trial. Noncategorical perception of the voicing distinction, reflected by an improvement in discrimination within phonetic categories, was obtained for the group of listeners who experienced both the sequential identification procedure and the 4IAX discrimination test. The results are interpreted as providing evidence for separate auditory and phonetic levels of discrimination in speech perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.1914506

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pisoni and Lazarus (1974) showed the 41-AX procedure to be more sensitive to acoustic processing than the ABX task.

    “For example, Pisoni and Lazarus (1974) showed the 41-AX procedure to be more sensitive to acoustic processing than the ABX task”

    From Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception (1985) · cites this paper as Pisoni and Lazarus (1974)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pisoni, D. B., & Lazarus, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1974-02-01
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
328-333
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W1996763374
Cited by
206
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000111-38)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
voice onset time, categorical perception, speech perception, phonetic discrimination, sequential identification, English speakers
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Humans, Phonetics, Speech, Voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review