The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences
Open accessAbstract
Speech comprehension is resistant to acoustic distortion in the input, reflecting listeners' ability to adjust perceptual processes to match the speech input. For noise-vocoded sentences, a manipulation that removes spectral detail from speech, listeners' reporting improved from near 0% to 70% correct over 30 sentences (Experiment 1). Learning was enhanced if listeners heard distorted sentences while they knew the identity of the undistorted target (Experiments 2 and 3). Learning was absent when listeners were trained with nonword sentences (Experiments 4 and 5), although the meaning of the training sentences did not affect learning (Experiment 5). Perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech depends on higher level information, consistent with top-down, lexically driven learning. Similar processes may facilitate comprehension of speech in an unfamiliar accent or following cochlear implantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This combination of distorted auditory presentation and clear written feedback has previously been used to demonstrate effective intelligibility training effects on similar degraded stimuli (Davis et al., 2005).”
From Distinct processing of ambiguous speech in people with non-clinical auditory verbal hallucinations (2017) · cites this paper as Davis et al., 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer
(2011) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31821473f7 · Cited by 8,010
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears
Cherry, E. C. (1953) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907229 · Cited by 4,774
Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues
Shannon, R., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303 · Cited by 3,302
The TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 3,044
DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195503 · Cited by 2,804
Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks
French, R. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01294-2 · Cited by 2,311
Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 · Cited by 1,982
A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later
Greenwood, D. D. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.399052 · Cited by 1,900
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 · Cited by 1,587
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Miller, 1981, Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions., 39
- Nusbaum, 1997, Talker normalization: Phonetic constancy as a cognitive process., 109
- 10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.40 · DOI
- Rodd, Neural systems for sentence comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity., Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 530
Shaping perceptual learning of synthetic speech through feedback
Lehet, M. I., Fenn, K. M., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01743-6 · Cited by 8
Tinnemore, A. R., Gordon-Salant, S. M., & Goupell, M. J. (2020) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216520960601 · Cited by 10
Zhong, L., Noud, B. P., Pruitt, H., Marcrum, S. C., & Picou, E. M. (2021) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1937346 · Cited by 8
Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. M. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0009170 · Cited by 8
Short-term retention of learning after rapid adaptation to native and non-native speech
Bieber, R. E., Makashay, M. J., Simpson, B. D., Sheffield, B. M., & Brungart, D. S. (2023) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0019749 · Cited by 8
Are the Products of Statistical Learning Abstract or Stimulus-Specific?
Vouloumanos, A., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., Balaban, E., & Hager, A. D. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00070 · Cited by 9
Summers, R. J., Bailey, P. J., & Roberts, B. (2016) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.026 · Cited by 8
Roberts, B., & Summers, R. J. (2018) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5023476 · Cited by 8
Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners
Ritter, C., & Vongpaisal, T. (2018) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216518804966 · Cited by 8
Carolan, P. J., Heinrich, A., Munro, K. J., & Millman, R. E. (2021) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1884907 · Cited by 11
Tasks, Talkers, and the Perceptual Learning of Time-Compressed Speech
Ghanayim, M. T. , Lavner, Y., & Banai, K. (2020) · Auditory Perception & Cognition · doi:10.1080/25742442.2020.1846011 · Cited by 8
Fleming, J. T., & Winn, M. B. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0013890 · Cited by 7
Adaptive Plasticity in Perceiving Speech Sounds
Ullas, S., Bonte, M. L., Formisano, E., & Vroomen, J. (2022) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81542-4_7 · Cited by 7
Subtitled speech: Phenomenology of tickertape synesthesia.
Hauw, F., Soudany, M. E., & Cohen, L. (2022) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.11.005 · Cited by 6
Intelligibility improves perception of timing changes in speech
Zoefel, B., Gilbert, R. A., & Davis, M. H. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279024 · Cited by 7
Moffat, R., Başkent, D., Luke, R., McAlpine, D., & Yper, L. N. V. (2023) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26305 · Cited by 6
Auditory Learning Using a Portable Real-Time Vocoder: Preliminary Findings
Casserly, E. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-h-13-0216 · Cited by 7
The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech
Freyman, R., Terpening, J., Costanzi, A., & Helfer, K. (2017) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000450 · Cited by 7
Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech
Newman, R. S., Morini, G., Shroads, E., & Chatterjee, M. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0001129 · Cited by 7
Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.
Luthra, S., Magnuson, J. S., & Myers, E. B. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000945 · Cited by 7
Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech
Drouin, J. R., & Theodore, R. M. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0013507 · Cited by 7
Huque, A. U., Heaney, A., Poliakoff, E., & Brown, R. J. (2017) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2017.1363275 · Cited by 7
Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differentlyPreprint
Hauswald, A., Keitel, A., Chen, Y.-P., Rösch, S., & Weisz, N. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/615302 · Cited by 8
Effects of training length on adaptation to noise-vocoded speech
Drouin, J. R., & Flores, S. (2024) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0025273 · Cited by 6
Reconceptualizing cognitive listening.
Mattys, S., O'Leary, R. M., McGarrigle, R., & Wingfield, A. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.09.014 · Cited by 14
Mo, Y., Zhou, H., Kong, F., Liu, Z., Liu, X., Huang, H., Huang, Y., Zheng, N., Meng, Q., & Wu, P. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104169 · Cited by 6
An online implementation of a measure of spectro-temporal processing by cochlear-implant listeners
Archer-Boyd, A. W., Harland, A. J., Goehring, T., & Carlyon, R. P. (2023) · JASA Express Letters · doi:10.1121/10.0016838 · Cited by 8
Perceptual Learning of Noise-Vocoded Speech Under Divided Attention
Wang, H., Chen, R., Yu, Y., McGettigan, C., Rosen, S., & Adank, P. (2023) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/23312165231192297 · Cited by 6
Perceptual Learning of Dysarthria in Adolescence
Borrie, S. A., Hepworth, T. J., Wynn, C. J., Hustad, K. C., Barrett, T. S., & Lansford, K. L. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00231 · Cited by 6
Cochlear–Implant Simulated Signal Degradation Exacerbates Listening Effort in Older Listeners
Abramowitz, J. C., Goupell, M. J., & Milvae, K. D. (2023) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001440 · Cited by 6
Sleep-Based Memory Consolidation Stabilizes Perceptual Learning of Noise-Vocoded Speech
Drouin, J. R., Zysk, V. A., Myers, E. B., & Theodore, R. M. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00139 · Cited by 6
Attention modulates perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech
Tzeng, C. Y., Russell-Meill, M., & Nygaard, L. C. (2023) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-023-02790-6 · Cited by 6
Intracranial electrophysiology of spectrally degraded speech in the human cortex
Nourski, K. V., Steinschneider, M., Rhone, A. E., Berger, J. I., Dappen, E. R., Kawasaki, H., & Howard, M. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1334742 · Cited by 6
Hopkins, K., King, A., & Moore, B. C. J. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4742719 · Cited by 6
Anderson, A., Lin, C. Y., & Wang, M. (2013) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.1451 · Cited by 6
Lexically Guided Perceptual Learning in Mandarin Chinese
Burchfield, L. A., Luk, S.-H. K., Antoniou, M., & Cutler, A. (2017) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-618 · Cited by 6
Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech
Grieco-Calub, T. M., Simeon, K. M., Snyder, H. E., & Lew-Williams, C. (2017) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1354129 · Cited by 4
Adaptive Plasticity Under Adverse Listening Conditions is Disrupted in Developmental Dyslexia
Gabay, Y., & Holt, L. L. (2020) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617720000661 · Cited by 6
Audition and Cognition: Where Lab Meets Clinic
Pichora-Fuller, M. (2008) · ASHA Leader · doi:10.1044/leader.ftr2.13102008.14 · Cited by 8
Processing linguistic variation through dual mechanisms of cognitive control
Berry, G. M. (2016) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2016-0033 · Cited by 7
Alghamdi, N., Maddock, S., Barker, J., & Brown, G. J. (2017) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2017.08.010 · Cited by 6
Speech recognition in adverse conditions
Bradlow, A. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4900089 · Cited by 10
Hysteresis in the selective synchronization of brain activity to musical rhythmPreprint
Lenc, T., Keller, P. E., Varlet, M., & Nozaradan, S. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/696914 · Cited by 6
Implicit learning and individual differences in speech recognition: an exploratory study
Khayr, R., Karawani, H., & Banai, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238823 · Cited by 5
Tolkacheva, V., Brownsett, S. L. E., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae087 · Cited by 6
Effect of spectral degradation on speech intelligibility and cortical representation
Choi, H. J., Kyong, J.-S., Won, J.-H., & Shim, H. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1368641 · Cited by 5
Choi, H. J., Kyong, J.-S., Lee, J. H., Han, S. H., & Shim, H. J. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0528-23.2024 · Cited by 5
Gianakas, S. P., & Winn, M. (2025) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2025_jslhr-24-00184 · Cited by 5
Infant perception of atypical speech signals.
Vouloumanos, A., & Gelfand, H. M. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029055 · Cited by 5
Predictability effects in degraded speech comprehension are reduced as a function of attention
Bhandari, P. N., Demberg, V., & Kray, J. (2022) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2022.16 · Cited by 5
Murai, S. A., & Riquimaroux, H. (2022) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-022-01593-8 · Cited by 5
Linguistic modulation of the neural encoding of phonemes
Kim, S.-G., Martino, F. D., & Overath, T. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae155 · Cited by 4
Listeners perceive prefixes differently: Evidence from a noise-rating task
Pycha, A. (2015) · WORD Structure · doi:10.3366/word.2015.0073 · Cited by 5
A chimpanzee recognizes varied acoustical versions of sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech
Heimbauer, L. A., Beran, M. J., & Owren, M. J. (2021) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01478-4 · Cited by 5
Perception in a Variable but Structured World: The Case of Speech PerceptionPreprint
Kleinschmidt, D. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/zwves · Cited by 5
Barrett, T. S., Borrie, S. A., & Yoho, S. E. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d8au4 · Cited by 5
Khayr, R., Khnifes, R., Shpak, T., & Banai, K. (2024) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001523 · Cited by 4
Effects of learning on somatosensory decision-making and experiences.
Huque, A. U., Poliakoff, E., & Brown, R. J. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000364 · Cited by 4
Sweet, S. J., Hedger, S. C. V., & Batterink, L. J. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105649 · Cited by 4
Zaltz, Y. (2024) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/23312165241275895 · Cited by 4
Macdonald, H. (2008) · Cited by 4
Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?
Casaponsa, A., Sohoglu, E., Moore, D. R., Füllgrabe, C., Molloy, K., & Amitay, S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226288 · Cited by 4
Brain electrical dynamics in speech segmentation depends upon prior experience with the language
Soni, S., & Tata, M. S. (2021) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104967 · Cited by 4
The Relevance of the Availability of Visual Speech Cues During Adaptation to Noise-Vocoded Speech
Trotter, A. S., Banks, B., & Adank, P. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00575 · Cited by 4
Auditory Training With Multiple Talkers and Passage-Based Semantic Cohesion
Casserly, E. D., & Barney, E. C. (2016) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-15-0357 · Cited by 4
Roberts, B., & Summers, R. J. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0002359 · Cited by 4
Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal
Martin, I. A., Goupell, M. J., & Huang, Y. T. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0009271 · Cited by 4
Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations
Whitmal, N. A., DeMaio, D. A., & Lin, R. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4906260 · Cited by 4
Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words
Bosen, A. K., Monzingo, E., & AuBuchon, A. M. (2020) · Auditory Perception & Cognition · doi:10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012 · Cited by 4
A proposed mechanism for rapid adaptation to spectrally distorted speech
Azadpour, M., & Balaban, E. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4922226 · Cited by 4
Statistical learning across passive listening adjusts perceptual weights of speech input dimensionsPreprint
Hodson, A. J., Shinn‐Cunningham, B. G., & Holt, L. L. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4kxz3 · Cited by 4
Bysouth‐Young, D., Guérit, F., Shahidi, L., & Carlyon, R. P. (2025) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001676 · Cited by 3
Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. M. (2024) · Auditory Perception & Cognition · doi:10.1080/25742442.2024.2345568 · Cited by 3
Neural Decoding of the Speech Envelope: Effects of Intelligibility and Spectral Degradation
MacIntyre, A., Carlyon, R., & Goehring, T. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1177/23312165241266316 · Cited by 7
Increasing Motivation Increases Intelligibility Benefits of Perceptual Training in Dysarthria
Borrie, S. A., Tetzloff, K. A., Barrett, T. S., & Lansford, K. L. (2024) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00196 · Cited by 4
Bieber, R. E., Tinnemore, A. R., Yeni–Komshian, G. H., & Gordon-Salant, S. M. (2021) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0005279 · Cited by 3
Identification of Minimal Pairs of Japanese Pitch Accent in Noise-Vocoded Speech
Sugiyama, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887761 · Cited by 4
Want to quickly adapt to distorted speech and become a better listener? Read lips, not text
Pourhashemi, F., Baart, M., van Laarhoven, T., & Vroomen, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278986 · Cited by 3
Adaptation of Gap Predictions in Filler-Gap Dependency Processing during Reading
Atkinson, E., & Omaki, A. (2023) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages8040285 · Cited by 3
Children benefit from gestures to understand degraded speech but to a lesser extent than adults
Sekine, K., & Özyürek, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1305562 · Cited by 5
Jiang, J., Johnson, J. C. S., Requena‐Komuro, M., Benhamou, E., Sivasathiaseelan, H., Chokesuwattanaskul, A., Nelson, A., Nortley, R., Weil, R. S., Volkmer, A., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-82694-z · Cited by 4
Auditory memory for random time patterns in cochlear implant listeners
Kang, H., Macherey, O., Roman, S., & Pressnitzer, D. (2021) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0005728 · Cited by 3
Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T., & Eberhardt, S. P. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13071008 · Cited by 3
(How) can listeners identify the L1 in foreign accented L2 speech?
Kolly, M.-J., & Dellwo, V. (2013) · Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique · doi:10.26034/tranel.2013.2949 · Cited by 3
Dickinson, A.-M., Baker, R., Siciliano, C., & Munro, K. J. (2014) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.921338 · Cited by 3
Current Directions in Research in Spoken Word Recognition
Samuel, A. G., & Sumner, M. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139029377.005 · Cited by 3
Heimbauer, L. A., Beran, M. J., & Owren, M. J. (2018) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/ijcp.2018.31.03.04 · Cited by 3
Lovett, R. E. S. (2010) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 3
Auditory-phonetic projection and lexical structure in the recognition of sine-wave words.
Remez, R. E., Dubowski, K. R., Broder, R. S., Davids, M. L., Grossman, Y. S., Москаленко, М., Pardo, J. S., & Hasbun, S. M. (2009) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4784171 · Cited by 3
Sensorimotor experience in speech perception
Schuerman, W. L. (2017) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 3
Perception of speech, music and emotion by hearing-impaired listeners
Metcalfe, T. (2017) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 4
Distracting Linguistic Information Impairs Neural Tracking of Attended SpeechPreprint
Dai, B., McQueen, J. M., Terporten, R., Peter Hagoort, A., & Kösem, A. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/364042 · Cited by 3
Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speechPreprint
Sohoglu, E., & Davis, M. H. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.22.054726 · Cited by 3
Corcoran, A. W., Perera, R., Koroma, M., Kouider, S., Hohwy, J., & Andrillon, T. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.06.459160 · Cited by 3
The relationship between sentence comprehension and lexical-semantic retuningPreprint
Gilbert, R. A., Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G., & Rodd, J. M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qvaud · Cited by 3
Fogerty, D., Ahlstrom, J. B., & Dubno, J. R. (2024) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0026450 · Cited by 2
Neural Processing of Noise‐Vocoded Speech Under Divided Attention: An fMRI ‐Machine Learning Study
Wang, H., Chen, R., Schlittenlacher, J., McGettigan, C., Rosen, S., & Adank, P. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70312 · Cited by 2
Perceptual learning of time-compressed speech across different training tasks
Davda, G. Y., Sussan, J., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2025) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0038966 · Cited by 2
Chavant, M., Hervais‐Adelman, A., & Macherey, O. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00385 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C.
- Affiliations
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 222-241
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2059217179
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- perceptual learning, noise-vocoded speech, speech understanding, lexical data, top-down processing, acoustic distortion, nonword learning, unfamiliar accents, cochlear implantation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Noise, Perception, Sound Spectrography, Speech Perception, Vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review