Cited by 531Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences

Open access

Davis, Matthew H., Johnsrude, Ingrid S., Hervais-Adelman, Alexis, Taylor, Karen, McGettigan, Carolyn·2005·Journal of Experimental Psychology General

DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Speech comprehension is resistant to acoustic distortion in the input, reflecting listeners' ability to adjust perceptual processes to match the speech input. For noise-vocoded sentences, a manipulation that removes spectral detail from speech, listeners' reporting improved from near 0% to 70% correct over 30 sentences (Experiment 1). Learning was enhanced if listeners heard distorted sentences while they knew the identity of the undistorted target (Experiments 2 and 3). Learning was absent when listeners were trained with nonword sentences (Experiments 4 and 5), although the meaning of the training sentences did not affect learning (Experiment 5). Perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech depends on higher level information, consistent with top-down, lexically driven learning. Similar processes may facilitate comprehension of speech in an unfamiliar accent or following cochlear implantation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer
(2011) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31821473f7 · Cited by 8,010
Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears
Cherry, E. C. (1953) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907229 · Cited by 4,774
Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues
Shannon, R., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303 · Cited by 3,302
The TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 3,044
DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195503 · Cited by 2,804
Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks
French, R. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01294-2 · Cited by 2,311
Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 · Cited by 1,982
A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later
Greenwood, D. D. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.399052 · Cited by 1,900
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 · Cited by 1,587

Show all 100 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Miller, 1981, Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions., 39
Nusbaum, 1997, Talker normalization: Phonetic constancy as a cognitive process., 109
10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.40 · DOI
Rodd, Neural systems for sentence comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity., Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 530

Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech
Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Green, T. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4754432 · Cited by 21
Multisensory training can promote or impede visual perceptual learning of speech stimuli: visual-tactile vs. visual-auditory training
Eberhardt, S. P., Auer, E. T., & Bernstein, L. E. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00829 · Cited by 21
Differential responses to spectrally degraded speech within human auditory cortex: An intracranial electrophysiology study
Nourski, K. V., Steinschneider, M., Rhone, A. E., Kovach, C. K., Kawasaki, H., & Howard, M. A. (2018) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.11.009 · Cited by 21
How reliable are online speech intelligibility studies with known listener cohorts?
Cooke, M. P., & Lecumberri, M. L. G. (2021) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0005880 · Cited by 21
Learning and bilingualism in challenging listening conditions: How challenging can it be?
Bsharat-Maalouf, D., & Karawani, H. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105018 · Cited by 15
The perceptual learning of time-compressed speech: A comparison of training protocols with different levels of difficulty
Gabay, Y., Karni, A., & Banai, K. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176488 · Cited by 20
Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners
Huang, Y. T., Newman, R. S., Catalano, A., & Goupell, M. J. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.029 · Cited by 20
Hearing Impairment and Perceived Clarity of Predictable Speech
Signoret, C., & Rudner, M. (2019) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000689 · Cited by 23
Audiovisual Cues and Perceptual Learning of Spectrally Distorted Speech
Pilling, M., & Thomas, S. M. (2011) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830911404958 · Cited by 20
How top-down processing enhances comprehension of noise-vocoded speech: Predictions about meaning are more important than predictions about form
Corps, R. E., & Rabagliati, H. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104114 · Cited by 22
Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of Eisenberg et al. (2002)
Roman, A. S., Pisoni, D. B., Kronenberger, W. G., & Faulkner, K. F. (2016) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000393 · Cited by 19
The Contribution of Cognitive Factors to Individual Differences in Understanding Noise-Vocoded Speech in Young and Older Adults
Rosemann, S., Gießing, C., Özyurt, J., Carroll, R., Puschmann, S., & Thiel, C. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00294 · Cited by 19
An introduction to hearing loss and screening procedures for behavioral research
Reilly, J. J., Troiani, V., Grossman, M., & Wingfield, R. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193038 · Cited by 19
Transient and sustained cortical activity elicited by connected speech of varying intelligibility
Tiitinen, H., Miettinen, I., Alku, P., & May, P. (2012) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-157 · Cited by 18
Informational masking of speech by acoustically similar intelligible and unintelligible interferers
Summers, R. J., & Roberts, B. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0000688 · Cited by 18
Sentence comprehension in proficient adult cochlear implant users: On the vulnerability of syntax
Anja Hahne, A., Wolf, A., Müller, J., Mürbe, D., & Friederici, A. D. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.653251 · Cited by 18
A follow-up investigation into the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech
Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., Liss, J., O’Beirne, G. A., & Anderson, T. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4736952 · Cited by 18
Stimulus uncertainty in auditory perceptual learning
Banai, K., & Amitay, S. (2012) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.009 · Cited by 18
Neural correlates of adaptation in freely-moving normal hearing subjects under cochlear implant acoustic simulations
Smalt, C. J., González-Castillo, J., Talavage, T. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Svirsky, M. A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.001 · Cited by 18
The Neurobiology of Lexical Access
Davis, M. H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00044-4 · Cited by 19
Brain substrates underlying auditory speech priming in healthy listeners and listeners with schizophrenia
Wu, C., Zheng, Y., Li, J., Wu, H., She, S., Liu, S.-Y., Ning, Y., & Li, L. (2016) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716002816 · Cited by 17
The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
Zhang, L., Schlaghecken, F., Harte, J. M., & Roberts, K. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.646137 · Cited by 17
Parametric Cognitive Load Reveals Hidden Costs in the Neural Processing of Perfectly Intelligible Degraded Speech
Ritz, H., Wild, C. J., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1777-21.2022 · Cited by 17
Two stages of speech envelope tracking in human auditory cortex modulated by speech intelligibility
Xu, N., Zhao, B., Luo, L., Zhang, K., Shao, X., Luan, G., Wang, Q., Hu, W., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac203 · Cited by 17
Leveraging interdisciplinary perspectives to optimize auditory training for cochlear implant users
Drouin, J. R., & Theodore, R. M. (2020) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12394 · Cited by 17
Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech
Goupell, M. J., Eisenberg, D., & Milvae, K. D. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02244-x · Cited by 17
Phonetic category activation predicts the direction and magnitude of perceptual adaptation to accented speech.
Wu, Y. C., & Holt, L. L. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0001037 · Cited by 17
Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages.
Bent, T., Loebach, J. L., Phillips, L., & Pisoni, D. B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0024281 · Cited by 17
Do We Perceive Others Better than Ourselves? A Perceptual Benefit for Noise-Vocoded Speech Produced by an Average Speaker
Schuerman, W. L., Meyer, A. S., & McQueen, J. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129731 · Cited by 17
Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.
Roberts, B., Summers, R. J., & Bailey, P. J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000038 · Cited by 17
Speech perception by humans and machines
Davis, M. H., & Scharenborg, O. (2017) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 17
Perceptual learning of temporally interrupted spectrally degraded speech
Benard, M. R., & Başkent, D. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4892756 · Cited by 16
Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: Effects on speech intelligibility
Mesnildrey, Q., & Macherey, O. (2014) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.001 · Cited by 16
Cognitive mechanisms underpinning successful perception of different speech distortions
Kennedy‐Higgins, D., Devlin, J. T., & Adank, P. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0001160 · Cited by 16
Forward and reverse hierarchies in auditory perceptual learning
Amitay, S. (2009) · Learning & Perception · doi:10.1556/lp.1.2009.1.5 · Cited by 17
On Dynamic Pitch Benefit for Speech Recognition in Speech Masker
Shen, J., & Souza, P. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01967 · Cited by 16
Factors that increase processing demands when listening to speech
Johnsrude, I. S., & Rodd, J. M. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4920048 · Cited by 16
Distracting linguistic information impairs neural tracking of attended speech
Dai, B., McQueen, J. M., Terporten, R., Peter Hagoort, A., & Kösem, A. (2022) · Current Research in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100043 · Cited by 16
Formant-frequency variation and informational masking of speech by extraneous formants: Evidence against dynamic and speech-specific acoustical constraints.
Roberts, B., Summers, R. J., & Bailey, P. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0036629 · Cited by 15
Predictive processing increases intelligibility of acoustically distorted speech: Behavioral and neural correlates
Hakonen, M., May, P., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Jokinen, E., Sams, M. E., & Tiitinen, H. (2017) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.789 · Cited by 14
Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity
McLaughlin, D. E., Carter, Y. D., Cheng, C. C., & Perrachione, T. K. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01778-5 · Cited by 15
The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions
Paulus, M., Hazan, V. L., & Adank, P. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0001212 · Cited by 15
Syllable Inference as a Mechanism for Spoken Language Understanding
Brown, M., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Dilley, L. C. (2021) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12529 · Cited by 18
Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech
Payne, B. R., Silcox, J. W., Crandell, H. A., Lash, A., Ferguson, S. H., & Lohani, M. (2021) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001079 · Cited by 15
Assessment methods for determining small changes in hearing performance over time
Brungart, D. S., Sherlock, L. P., Kuchinsky, S. E., Perry, T. T., Bieber, R. E., Grant, K. W., & Bernstein, J. G. W. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0011509 · Cited by 15
Adaptation to spectrally-rotated speech
Green, T., Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Paterson, R. (2013) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4812759 · Cited by 15
Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
Carlyon, R. P., Monstrey, J., Deeks, J. M., & Macherey, O. (2014) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.932024 · Cited by 15
Linguistically guided adaptation to foreign-accented speech
Cooper, A., & Bradlow, A. R. (2016) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4966585 · Cited by 15
Under-resourced or overloaded? Rethinking working memory deficits in developmental language disorder.
Jones, S. D., & Westermann, G. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000338 · Cited by 14
The recognition of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing
Tinnemore, A. R., Montero, L., Gordon-Salant, S. M., & Goupell, M. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.887581 · Cited by 14
Effects of the Rate of Formant-Frequency Variation on the Grouping of Formants in Speech Perception
Summers, R. J., Bailey, P. J., & Roberts, B. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-011-0307-y · Cited by 14
Why Doesn't a Songbird (the European Starling) Use Pitch to Recognize Tone Sequences? The Informational Independence Hypothesis
Patel, A. D. (2017) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2017.120003 · Cited by 14
Event-related potentials reflect prediction errors and pop-out during comprehension of degraded speech
Banellis, L., Sokoliuk, R., Wild, C. J., Bowman, H., & Cruse, D. (2020) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niaa022 · Cited by 13
Rapid Perceptual Learning and Individual Differences in Speech Perception: The Good, the Bad, and the Sad
Banai, K., & Lavie, L. (2020) · Auditory Perception & Cognition · doi:10.1080/25742442.2021.1909400 · Cited by 14
Across-formant integration and speech intelligibility: Effects of acoustic source properties in the presence and absence of a contralateral interferer
Summers, R. J., Bailey, P. J., & Roberts, B. (2016) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4960595 · Cited by 14
Perceptual learning of co-articulation in speech
Connine, C. M., & Darnieder, L. M. (2009) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.003 · Cited by 13
Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner
Bhandari, P. N., Demberg, V., & Kray, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714485 · Cited by 14
Age-Related Neural Oscillation Patterns During the Processing of Temporally Manipulated Speech
Rufener, K. S., Oechslin, M. S., Wöstmann, M., Dellwo, V., & Meyer, M. E. (2015) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-015-0464-0 · Cited by 14
Vocoded speech perception with simulated shallow insertion depths in adults and children
Waked, A., Dougherty, S. C., & Goupell, M. J. (2017) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4973649 · Cited by 13
Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
Panouillères, M., Boyles, R., Chesters, J., Watkins, K. E., & Möttönen, R. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.007 · Cited by 14
Listeners use temporal information to identify French- and English-accented speech
Kolly, M.-J., de Mareüil, P. B., Leemann, A., & Dellwo, V. (2016) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2016.11.006 · Cited by 12
Effects of early home language environment on perception and production of speech
Tao, L., & Taft, M. (2016) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728916000730 · Cited by 12
Effect of F0 contour on perception of Mandarin Chinese speech against masking
Wu, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209976 · Cited by 12
Effects of stimulus repetition and training schedule on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its transfer
Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01714-7 · Cited by 12
Familiarization Effects on Consonant Intelligibility in Dysarthric Speech
Kim, H. (2015) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000444255 · Cited by 12
Lexical Effects on the Perceived Clarity of Noise-Vocoded Speech in Younger and Older Listeners
Tamati, T. N., Sevich, V. A., Clausing, E. M., & Moberly, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837644 · Cited by 12
Musical Emotion Categorization with Vocoders of Varying Temporal and Spectral Content
Harding, E. E., Gaudrain, É., Hrycyk, I., Harris, R. L., Tillmann, B., Maat, B., Free, R. H., & Başkent, D. (2023) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/23312165221141142 · Cited by 11
Statistical learning across passive listening adjusts perceptual weights of speech input dimensions
Hodson, A. J., Shinn‐Cunningham, B. G., & Holt, L. L. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105473 · Cited by 11
Informational masking of monaural target speech by a single contralateral formant
Roberts, B., & Summers, R. J. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4919344 · Cited by 11
Perceptual Restoration of Temporally Distorted Speech in L1 vs. L2: Local Time Reversal and Modulation Filtering
Ishida, M., Arai, T., & Kashino, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01749 · Cited by 11
Dichotic integration of acoustic-phonetic information: Competition from extraneous formants increases the effect of second-formant attenuation on intelligibility
Roberts, B., & Summers, R. J. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5091443 · Cited by 11
Arousal States as a Key Source of Variability in Speech Perception and Learning
Schuerman, W. L., Chandrasekaran, B., & Leonard, M. K. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7010019 · Cited by 11
Effects of Lexical and Somatosensory Feedback on Long-Term Improvements in Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech
Borrie, S. A., & Schäfer, M. C. M. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0411 · Cited by 11
Comprehension of Degraded Speech Matures During Adolescence
Huyck, J. J. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-17-0252 · Cited by 11
Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech
Ueda, K., Araki, T., & Nakajima, Y. (2018) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.005 · Cited by 11
Lexically-guided perceptual learning in early Cantonese-English bilinguals
Chan, L., Johnson, K. A., & Babel, M. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0000942 · Cited by 11
Employing deep learning model to evaluate speech information in acoustic simulations of Cochlear implants
Sinha, R., & Azadpour, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73173-6 · Cited by 10
Guided by Expectations: Overweighted Semantic Priors in Schizotypy and Their Links to Glutamate
Knolle, F., Sterner, E., Demler, V. F., MacGregor, L. J., & Mathys, C. D. (2025) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.025 · Cited by 14
Eye Gaze and Perceptual Adaptation to Audiovisual Degraded Speech
Banks, B., Gowen, E., Munro, K. J., & Adank, P. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00106 · Cited by 10
Recognition of vocoded speech in English by Mandarin-speaking English-learners
Yang, J., Wagner, A., Zhang, Y., & Xu, L. (2021) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2021.11.008 · Cited by 10
Rapid but specific perceptual learning partially explains individual differences in the recognition of challenging speech
Banai, K., Karawani, H., Lavie, L., & Lavner, Y. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14189-8 · Cited by 10
Multivariate analysis of brain activity patterns as a tool to understand predictive processes in speech perception
Ufer, C., & Blank, H. (2023) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2023.2166679 · Cited by 10
Level-Dependent Changes in Perception of Speech Envelope Cues
Dubno, J. R., Ahlstrom, J. B., Wang, X., & Horwitz, A. R. (2012) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-012-0343-2 · Cited by 10
Cognitive disruption by noise-vocoded speech stimuli: Effects of spectral variation
Senan, T. U., Jelfs, S., & Kohlrausch, A. (2018) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5026619 · Cited by 10
How do listeners time response articulation when answering questions? The role of speech rate.
Corps, R. E., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000759 · Cited by 10
Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
Hino, Y., Kusunose, Y., Miyamura, S., & Lupker, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000281 · Cited by 10
The Effect of Free-Field Presentation and Processing Strategy on a Measure of Spectro-Temporal Processing by Cochlear-Implant Listeners
Archer-Boyd, A. W., Goehring, T., & Carlyon, R. P. (2020) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216520964281 · Cited by 11
During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise
Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T., & Eberhardt, S. P. (2021) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/2021_aja-21-00034 · Cited by 9
Identifying Links Between Latent Memory and Speech Recognition Factors
Bosen, A. K., & Doria, G. M. (2023) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001430 · Cited by 9
Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults
Goupell, M. J., Draves, G. T., & Litovsky, R. Y. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244632 · Cited by 9
Children’s Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Cartoon Voices
van Heugten, M., Volkova, A., Trehub, S. E., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2013) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3182a468d0 · Cited by 9
Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues
Wirtzfeld, M. R., Ibrahim, R. A., & Bruce, I. C. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-017-0627-7 · Cited by 9
Perceptual Doping: An Audiovisual Facilitation Effect on Auditory Speech Processing, From Phonetic Feature Extraction to Sentence Identification in Noise
Moradi, S., Lidestam, B., Ng, E. H. N., Danielsson, H., & Rönnberg, J. (2018) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000616 · Cited by 9
On the lexical source of variable L2 phoneme production
John, P. S., & Frasnelli, J. (2022) · The Mental Lexicon · doi:10.1075/ml.22002.joh · Cited by 9
Barriers to Early Progress in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes
Marx, M., Laborde, M., Algans, C., Tartayre, M., & James, C. J. (2024) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001559 · Cited by 8
Opposing neural processing modes alternate rhythmically during sustained auditory attention
Kasten, F. H., Busson, Q., & Zoefel, B. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06834-x · Cited by 9
Isolating neural signatures of conscious speech perception with a no-report sine-wave speech paradigm
Zhu, Y., Li, C., Hendry, C., Glass, J., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Pitts, M. A., & Dykstra, A. R. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0145-23.2023 · Cited by 11
Isolating Neural Indices of Continuous Speech Processing at the Phonetic Level
Liberto, G. M. D., & Lalor, E. C. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_35 · Cited by 8
Phonetic alignment in English as a lingua franca: Coming together while splitting apart
Berry, G., & Ernestus, M. (2018) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658317737348 · Cited by 5
Effect of Chronic Stimulation and Stimulus Level on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners
Carlyon, R. P., Guérit, F., Billig, A. J., Tam, Y. C., Harris, F. P., & Deeks, J. M. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-018-00706-y · Cited by 8

Authors: Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C.
Affiliations: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
University College London (GB)
ORCID: Davis, Matthew H.
Johnsrude, Ingrid S.
Hervais-Adelman, Alexis
McGettigan, Carolyn
Venue: Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 2005
Volume: 134
Issue: 2
Pages: 222-241
ISSN: 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
1939-2222
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222
OpenAlex: W2059217179
Cited by: 531
References: 100
Citations by year: 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 35
FWCI: 15.18
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
hdl.handle.net
Licence: other-oa
Locations: Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords: perceptual learning, noise-vocoded speech, speech understanding, lexical data, top-down processing, acoustic distortion, nonword learning, unfamiliar accents, cochlear implantation
MeSH terms: Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Noise, Perception, Sound Spectrography, Speech Perception, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks