The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Processes in Prospective Memory Retrieval: Factors Determining Monitoring Versus Spontaneous Retrieval.
Abstract
Theoretically, prospective memory retrieval can be accomplished either by controlled monitoring of the environment for a target event or by a more reflexive process that spontaneously responds to the presence of a target event. These views were evaluated in Experiments 1-4 by examining whether performing a prospective memory task produced costs on the speed of performing the ongoing task. In Experiment 5, the authors directly tested for the existence of spontaneous retrieval. The results supported the multiprocess theory (M. A. McDaniel & G. O. Einstein, 2000) predictions that (a) spontaneous retrieval can occur and can support good prospective memory and (b) depending on task demands and individual differences, people rely to different degrees on monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval for prospective remembering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,051
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1252 · Cited by 5,312
(2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807102 · Cited by 4,154
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · cited 1×
“This analysis is consistent with that of Bargh and Chartrand (1999) who have argued that most of our behaviors are not initiated by conscious will over a broad range of situations but rather are automatically triggered in response to the presence of environmental stimuli.”
ResultBattig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027577 · Cited by 2,570
Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium
Brown, A. S., & Solso, R. L. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421430 · Cited by 2,382
Attention And Cognitive Control 1
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (2024) · Information Processing and Cognition · doi:10.4324/9781032722450-4 · Cited by 2,264
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727 · Cited by 2,017
Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2.
Wagner, D. G., Higgins, E. T., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072281 · Cited by 1,970
Cited by
Prospective Memory: Multiple Retrieval Processes
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x · Cited by 441
Self-citationInvoluntary Autobiographical Memories: An Introduction to the Unbidden Past
Berntsen, D. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511575921 · Cited by 422
Functional correlates of prospective memory in stroke
Kant, N., van den Berg, E., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Frijns, C. J. M., Kappelle, L. J., & Postma, A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.015 · Cited by 393
Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810002106 · Cited by 332
Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: What have we learnt so far?
Burgess, P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi, G., & Volle, E. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.014 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-342
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2137262514
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Processes in Prospective Memory Retrieval: Factors Determining Monitoring Versus Spontaneous Retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
- The paper
- Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple Processes in Prospective Memory Retrieval: Factors Determining Monitoring Versus Spontaneous Retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
