The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective Memory: Multiple Retrieval Processes
Abstract
An interesting challenge for researchers who study prospective memory is to explain how people recognize environmental events as cues for actions. Whereas some theorists propose that a capacity-consuming monitoring process is the only means by which intentions can be retrieved, we argue that the cognitive system relies on multiple processes, including spontaneous processes that reflexively respond to the presence of target events. We present evidence for the existence of spontaneous retrieval processes and apply the idea of multiple processes to mixed findings on age-related decline in prospective memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · cited 1×
“Our thinking was influenced by subjective reports from participants in our earliest research indicating that the PM intention often "popped" into mind (Einstein & McDaniel, 1990) and by Bargh and Chartrand's (1999) arguments that people have a limited capacity for conscious control over behavior and that many be havio…”
Normal aging and prospective memory.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.717 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationStrategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.775 · Cited by 1,149
Self-citationSmith, R. E. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347 · Cited by 686
A Meta-Analytic Review of Prospective Memory and Aging.
Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Phillips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27 · Cited by 611
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327 · Cited by 548
Self-citationEveryday memory : actions and absent-mindedness
Harris, J. E., & Morris, P. (1984) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 487
Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory.
Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.24.2.336 · Cited by 337
Cue-Focused and Reflexive-Associative Processes in Prospective Memory Retrieval.
McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., & Breneiser, J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.605 · Cited by 297
Self-citationInterference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Lally, P., & Gardner, B. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.603640 · Cited by 901
Episodic Simulation of Future Events: Concepts, Data, and Applications
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.001 · Cited by 840
Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits
Pinder, C., Vermeulen, J., Cowan, B. R., & Beale, R. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3196830 · Cited by 235
Cognitive Control: Core Constructs and Current Considerations
Cohen, J. D. (2017) · The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control · doi:10.1002/9781118920497.ch1 · Cited by 179
Transparent Meta-Analysis of Prospective Memory and Aging
Uttl, B. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001568 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 286-290
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2116944385
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Memory: Multiple Retrieval Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x
- The paper
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective Memory: Multiple Retrieval Processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
