The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ROLLNICK, S., HEATHER, N., GOLD, R., & HALL, W. (1992) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02720.x · Cited by 818
Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment
DiClemente, C. C., Schlundt, D., & Gemmell, L. (2004) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1080/10550490490435777 · Cited by 569
Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434964 · Cited by 339
Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS): Overview and Description
Justice, A. C., Dombrowski, E., Conigliaro, J., Fultz, S. L., Gibson, D., Madenwald, T., Goulet, J., Simberkoff, M., Butt, A. A., Rimland, D., et al. (2006) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000223741.02074.66 · Cited by 320
Assessing motivation to quit smoking in people with mental illness: a review
Siru, R., Hulse, G. K., & Tait, R. J. (2009) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02545.x · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Biener, L., & Abrams, D. B.
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 360-365
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- OpenAlex
- W4296148892
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0278-6133.10.5.360
- The paper
- Biener, L., & Abrams, D. B. (1991). The Contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.10.5.360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
