CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Negative affect and barriers to exercise among early stage breast cancer patients

Perna, Frank M., Craft, Lynette, Carver, Charles S., Antoni, Michael H.·2008·Health Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.275
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative frequency of and barriers to exercise among women with breast cancer while controlling for cancer-relevant and demographic factors. DESIGN: The present study employed concurrent samples, correlational research design. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exercise frequency and its association with negative affect and barriers to exercise, independent of cancer treatment, among women (N=176) with Stage I or II breast cancer who were 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. RESULTS: After accounting for cancer-relevant and control variables, degree of negative affect and frequency of perceived barriers were significantly inversely associated with exercise. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that attention to both emotional factors and psychosocial barriers to exercise may be warranted to further understand exercise among women with early stage breast cancer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.275

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Perna, F. M., Craft, L., Carver, C. S., & Antoni, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
ORCID
Venue
Health Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2008-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
275-279
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
DOI
10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.275
OpenAlex
W2060097605
Cited by
22
References
36
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01-CA78801; CA-64710)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH18917)
  • US Department of Defense (J4236-DAMD1794)
  • National Institutes of Health (M01RR005333)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
breast cancer, early breast cancer, barriers to exercise, negative affect, exercise frequency, psychosocial barriers, emotional factors, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Culture, Depression, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review