Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.

Abstract

When people in conversation refer repeatedly to the same object, they come to use the same terms. This phenomenon, called lexical entrainment, has several possible explanations. Ahistorical accounts appeal only to the informativeness and availability of terms and to the current salience of the object's features. Historical accounts appeal in addition to the recency and frequency of past references and to partner-specific conceptualizations of the object that people achieve interactively. Evidence from 3 experiments favors a historical account and suggests that when speakers refer to an object, they are proposing a conceptualization of it, a proposal their addresses may or may not agree to. Once they do establish a shared conceptualization, a conceptual pact, they appeal to it in later references even when they could use simpler references. Over time, speakers simplify conceptual pacts and, when necessary, abandon them for new conceptualizations.

Cites (35)

1. Basic objects in natural categories
   Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B, Gray, Wayne D, Johnson, David M, Boyes-Braem, Penny · 1976 · Cognitive Psychology
2. Grounding in communication.
   Clark, Herbert H., Brennan, Susan E. · 1991 · Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
3. Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
   1991 · American Psychological Association eBooks
4. Referring as a collaborative process
   Clark, Herbert H., Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna · 1986 · Cognition
5. Contributing to discourse
   Clark, Herbert H., Schaefer, Edward F. · 1989 · Cognitive Science
6. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication
   Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., Dumais, S. T. · 1987 · Communications of the ACM
7. When Nouns Surface as Verbs
   Clark, Eve V., Clark, Herbert H. · 1979 · Language
8. Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination
   Garrod, Simon, Anderson, Anthony · 1987 · Cognition
9. Understanding by addressees and overhearers
   Schober, Michael F, Clark, Herbert H · 1989 · Cognitive Psychology
10. The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition
    2014 · Mechanisms of Language Acquisition

Show all 35 references

Cited by (1,002)

1. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
   Bender, Emily M., Gebru, Timnit, McMillan-Major, Angelina, Shmitchell, Shmargaret · 2021 · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
2. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
   Pickering, Martin J., Garrod, Simon · 2004 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
3. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
   Pickering, Martin J., Garrod, Simon · 2013 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
4. Toward a second-person neuroscience
   Schilbach, Leonhard, Timmermans, Bert, Reddy, Vasudevi, Costall, Alan, Bente, Gary, Schlicht, Tobias, Vogeley, Kai · 2013 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
5. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics
   Cameron, Lynne, Larsen-Freeman, Diane · 2007 · International Journal of Applied Linguistics

See all 1,457

Related (9)

1. When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions
   Metzing, C · 2003 · Journal of Memory and Language
2. Lexical entrainment without conceptual pacts? Revisiting the matching task
   Adrian Bangerter, Eric Mayor, Dominique Knutsen · 2020 · Journal of Memory and Language
3. The Flexibility of Conceptual Pacts: Referring Expressions Dynamically Shift to Accommodate New Conceptualizations
   Alyssa Ibarra, Michael K. Tanenhaus · 2016 · Frontiers in Psychology
4. Lexical entrainment and lexical differentiation in reference phrase choice
   Mija M. Van Der Wege · 2009 · Journal of Memory and Language
5. Conceptual match as a determinant of reference reuse in dialogue.
   Dominique Knutsen, Ludovic Le Bigot · 2016 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

See all