Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics

Cameron, Lynne, Larsen-Freeman, Diane·2007·International Journal of Applied Linguistics

Abstract

This book introduces and develops the potential of complex systems as a metaphor or supra-theory for systems in applied linguistics. Change and heterogeneity are central to complex systems theory and to the resonances that we find between complex systems and applied linguistics systems. The book explores these resonances and what happens when complex systems theory is used to make sense of central areas of applied linguistic concerns: language, language learning, discourse and the language classroom. Principles of complex systems theory are explained, drawing on work that has been most developed in the biological sciences and that is being extended into the social sciences, developmental psychology and other applied disciplines. These principles importantly include descriptions of change over time (system dynamics) that work for all levels and scales: movement from temporary and relative stability through adaptive behaviours and self-organisation to the emergence of new patterns that are not amenable to reductive explanations. Seeing applied systems as complex, adaptive and dynamic opens up new conceptualisations of properties and activities, enables new questions about how people use, learn and teach languages, and demands new ways of investigating behaviour and development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Baake K., 2003, Metaphor and knowledge
  2. Bakhtin M.M., 1981, The dialogic imagination
  3. Bakhtin M.M., 1986, Speech genres and other late essays
  4. Beer R., 1995, Mind as motion, 121
  5. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cameron L., 2003, Metaphor in educational discourse
  8. 10.1093/applin/aml032 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Clark H., 1996, Using language, 10.1017/CBO9780511620539 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cook V., 2002, Portraits of the L2 user, 10.21832/9781853595851 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1017/S1366728906002732 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/applin/aml028 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fischer K., 2003, Handbook of developmental psychology, 491
  14. Gee J.P., 1999, An introduction to discourse analysis
  15. Herdina P., 2002, A dynamic model of multilingualism, 10.21832/9781853595547 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kauffman S., 1995, At home in the universe
  17. 10.1093/applin/18.2.141 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Larsen-Freeman D., 2000, Techniques and principles in language teaching
  19. Larsen-Freeman D., 2002, Language acquisition and language socialization, 33
  20. Larsen-Freeman D., 2003, Teaching language: from grammar to grammaring
  21. Larsen-Freeman D., 2005, Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition, 189, 10.21832/9781853598371-012 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/applin/aml029 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Leather J., 2003, Towards an ecology of language acquisition, 10.1007/978-94-017-0341-3 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lewontin R., 2000, The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment
  25. MacWhinney B., 2005, Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition, 134, 10.21832/9781853598371-009 · DOI
  26. Meara P., 1997, Vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy, 109
  27. 10.1093/applin/aml030 · DOI
  28. Mohanan K.P., 1992, Phonological development, 635
  29. Port R., 1995, Mind as motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition
  30. Saltzman E., 1995, Mind as motion, 149
  31. Schegloff E., 2001, The handbook of discourse analysis, 229
  32. Schiffrin D., 2001, The handbook of discourse analysis, 1
  33. Sealey A., 2004, Applied linguistics as social science
  34. 10.1017/S0267190504000145 · DOI · Paper page
  35. A. Sfard (1998 ) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one . Educational Researcher, March: 4-13. · doi:10.3102/0013189x027002004 · Paper page
  36. Sinclair J., 1975, Towards an analysis of discourse
  37. Slobin D., 1996, Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70
  38. Thelen E., 1994, A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action, 10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1515/cogl.2001.012 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Tucker M., 1993, A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications
  41. Van Geert P., 2003, Handbook of developmental psychology, 640
  42. Van Geert P., 2005, Mind, brain, and education

Cited by

See all 1,317

Metadata

Authors
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
Venue
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
226-240
ISSN
  • 0802-6106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4192
OpenAlex
W1971196056
Cited by
1,317
References
3
FWCI
30.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2984 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
The paper
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.