The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.
Abstract
Prospective memory tasks are often accomplished during the performance of other activities. Despite the dual-task nature of prospective memory, little attention has been paid to how successful prospective memory performance affects ongoing activities. In the first 2 experiments, participants performing an embedded prospective memory task had longer response times on nonprospective memory target trials of a lexical decision task than participants performing the lexical decision task alone. In the prospective memory groups, longer lexical decision response times were associated with better prospective memory performance (Experiments 1, 2, and 3), a pattern not demonstrated with an embedded retrospective memory task (Experiment 2). The results of Experiment 3 suggest that the retrieval of a delayed intention, or the prospective component, can require capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2021) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(21)x0002-3 · Cited by 5,027
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80048-8 · Cited by 1,523
Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03214546 · Cited by 1,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Normal aging and prospective memory.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.717 · Cited by 1,391
Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span
Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6 · Cited by 1,188
Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.775 · Cited by 1,149
Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues
Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (1988) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,038
Cited by
Prospective Memory: Multiple Retrieval Processes
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x · Cited by 441
Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions.
Gilbert, S. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., Cohen, A.-L., Oettingen, G., & Burgess, P. W. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0015535 · Cited by 211
Reynolds, J. R., West, R., & Braver, T. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn164 · Cited by 181
Maillet, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.017 · Cited by 135
Decoding the Content of Delayed Intentions
Gilbert, S. J. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5336-10.2011 · Cited by 95
“RTs on PM storage trials were significantly slower than baseline storage trials (PM, 878 ms; baseline, 842 ms; F(1,30) 29.2, p 0.0001), indicating a RT cost associated with maintaining PM intentions and/or monitoring ongoing trials for PM cues (Smith, 2003; Einstein et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-361
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W1982197391
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347
- The paper
- Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
