The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
Abstract
Previous studies of event-based prospective memory have demonstrated that the character of an ongoing task can affect cue detection. By contrast, this study demonstrated that there is a reciprocal relationship insofar as cue-verification and response-retrieval processes interfered with making a response in the ongoing task. The amount of interference was determined by the type of intention, which was manipulated to affect the complexity of verification and retrospective response retrieval. These relationships were true even when the interference caused by cue detection was separated from a more general effect to ongoing-task performance caused by shifts in attentional allocation policies. The results have theoretical implications for models that attempt to specify the cognitive microstructure of event-based prospective memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normal aging and prospective memory.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.717 · Cited by 1,391
Cited by
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327 · Cited by 548
Prospective Memory: Multiple Retrieval Processes
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x · Cited by 441
Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: What have we learnt so far?
Burgess, P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi, G., & Volle, E. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.014 · Cited by 280
Reynolds, J. R., West, R., & Braver, T. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn164 · Cited by 181
Jáger, T., & Kliegel, M. (2008) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.3200/genp.135.1.4-22 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 861-870
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2136191268
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861
- The paper
- Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
