The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall.
Abstract
150 undergraduates were given instructions in using 1 of 4 mnemonic techniques: imagery, the link method, a peg system, or the method of loci. Relative to controls, all mnemonic groups showed an advantage in memorizing 20-word lists for unordered recall. However, the greatest differences appeared when recall was scored by a strict positional criterion whereby Ss received credit for recalling a word only when it was placed in its correct position. By this scoring method, peg and loci Ss performed best on an immediate test, and imagery and control Ss, worst. Performance of Ss told to use linking images was intermediate. Mnemonic devices have greater effects on the ordering of recall than on the number of words that can be recalled without regard to order. Some experimental failures to show that mnemonic devices are effective may have been due to testing only item information. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An important limitation of research into MOL is that the effective use of MOL traditionally requires extensive training [e.g., two 1-h training sessions (4), three 2-h training sessions (19), one session of training and the request to practice overnight and the next day before testing (22)].”
From The method of loci as a mnemonic device to facilitate learning in endocrinology leads to improvement in student performance as measured by assessments (2014) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Memory plasticity across the life span: Uncovering children's latent potential.
Brehmer, Y., Li, S.-C., Müller, V., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.465 · Cited by 180
External and internal memory aids: When and how often do we use them?
Intons-Peterson, M. J., & Fournier, J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.3.267 · Cited by 168
Lindenberger, U., Kliegl, R., & Baltes, P. B. (1992) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.585 · Cited by 95
Qureshi, A., Rizvi, F., Syed, A., Shahid, A., & Manzoor, H. (2014) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00092.2013 · Cited by 55
Dream to Predict? REM Dreaming as Prospective Coding
Llewellyn, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01961 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Roediger, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 558-567
- ISSN
- 0096-1515
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558
- The paper
- Roediger, H. L. (1980). The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558