CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 213Student Stress and CopingResilience and Mental HealthStress and Burnout Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stress, anxiety and coping: The multidimensional interaction model.

Endler, Norman S.·1997·Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
DOI 10.1037/0708-5591.38.3.136
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Donald O.Hebb Award for Distinguished Contribution to Psychology as a ScienCe (1997) / Prix Donald O. Hebb pour contribution remarquable a la psychologie en tant que science (1997)AbstractThe multidimensional interaction model of stress, anxiety and coping processes is discussed and tested. aim is to advance our understanding of the systematic nature of coping processes in relation to psychological variables such as anxiety, as well as to determine how coping is related to other personality and situational variables, and to physical and mental well being. Coping styles and strategies mediate between antecedent stressful events, and such consequences as anxiety, psychological distress and somatic complaints.Task-oriented coping is most efficacious in a controllable situation, while emotion-oriented coping is most efficacious in an uncontrollable situation. While avoidance-oriented coping may be initially appropriate as a reaction to stress, in the long run task-oriented coping is most efficacious. A number of laboratory studies assessing the multidimensional interaction model are reviewed. These studies have both theoretical and practical implications, and contribute to empirical knowledge about stress, coping processes, and personality.PrologueIt gives me great pleasure to be the 1997 recipient of the Canadian Psychological Association Donald O. Hebb Award for Distinguished Contribution to Psychology as a Science. It is doubly delicious because of my past associations with Mc…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0708-5591.38.3.136

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–212 of 212

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Endler, N. S.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Endler, Norman S.
Venue
Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1997-08
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
136-153
ISSN
  • 0708-5591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7304
DOI
10.1037/0708-5591.38.3.136
OpenAlex
W1972306407
Cited by
213
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
stress, anxiety, coping, task-oriented coping, emotion-focused coping, avoidance coping, perceived controllability, psychological distress, somatic symptoms, personality, coping styles, coping strategies, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review