The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Efficacy of Play Therapy With Children: A Meta-Analytic Review of Treatment Outcomes.
Open accessAbstract
The efficacy of psychological interventions for children has long been debated among mental health professionals; however, only recently has this issue received national attention, with the U.S. Public Health Service (2000) emphasizing the critical need for early intervention and empirically validated treatments tailored to children's maturational needs. Play therapy is a developmentally responsive intervention widely used by child therapists but often criticized for lacking an adequate research base to support its growing practice. A meta-analysis of 93 controlled outcome studies (published 1953-2000) was conducted to assess the overall efficacy of play therapy and to determine factors that might impact its effectiveness. The overall treatment effect for play therapy interventions was 0.80 standard deviations. Further analysis revealed that effects were more positive for humanistic than for nonhumanistic treatments and that using parents in play therapy produced the largest effects. Play therapy appeared equally effective across age, gender, and presenting issue. Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S. S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.450 · Cited by 884 · cited 20×
“Though Kazdin and his colleagues did not report an overall effect size, Weisz et al. (1995) estimated a pooled treatment effect of 0.84 for the 105 controlled studies.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Cited by
Evidence-based Kernels: Fundamental Units of Behavioral Influence
Embry, D. D., & Biglan, A. (2008) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0036-x · Cited by 396
Lalor, K., & McElvaney, R. (2010) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838010378299 · Cited by 376
Play and optimal welfare: Does play indicate the presence of positive affective states?
Ahloy-Dallaire, J., Espinosa, J., & Mason, G. (2018) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.011 · Cited by 200
Sadeh, A., Hen-Gal, S., & Tikotzky, L. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1348 · Cited by 137
Early Intervention with Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Programs
Rojas-Torres, L. P., Alonso-Esteban, Y., & Alcantud-Marín, F. (2020) · Children · doi:10.3390/children7120294 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Bratton, S. C., Ray, D., Rhine, T., & Jones, L.
- Venue
- Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 376-390
- ISSN
- 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2069903518
- Cited by
- 831
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
