Cited by 137Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Therapy and DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

Young Children's Reactions to War-Related Stress: A Survey and Assessment of an Innovative Intervention

Sadeh, Avi, Hen-Gal, Shai, Tikotzky, Liat·2008·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The goal was to assess stress reactions in young children during and after war and the effects of a new brief intervention. METHODS. Two separate studies were conducted. In study I, we assessed war exposure and stress reactions of 74 children (2–7 years of age) in a sheltered camp during the second Israel-Lebanon war (July to August 2006). Their exposure to war experiences and their stress reactions were assessed through parental reports during the last week of the war. In addition to standard care, 35 children received a brief intervention (Huggy-Puppy intervention) aimed at encouraging them to care for a needy Huggy-Puppy doll that was given to them as a gift. The effects of the Huggy-Puppy intervention were assessed in a follow-up interview 3 weeks after the war. Study II assessed the efficacy of group administration of the Huggy-Puppy intervention to 191 young children, compared with 101 control subjects. The effects of the intervention on stress-related symptoms after the war were assessed in telephone interviews with the parents. RESULTS. Study I indicated that, during the war, most children had significant exposure to war-related experiences and had severe stress reactions. The Huggy-Puppy intervention was associated with significant reductions in stress reactions in the postwar assessment. A higher level of attachment and involvement with the doll was associated with better outcomes. The results of study II indicated that group administration of the Huggy-Puppy intervention was associated with significant reductions in stress reactions. CONCLUSION. These studies suggest that the Huggy-Puppy intervention may offer pediatricians and other child health care professionals a promising, cost-effective intervention for children during stressful times.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-1348

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadeh, A., Hen-Gal, S., & Tikotzky, L.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Sadeh, Avi
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
46-53
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2103689858
Cited by
137
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
combat stress, young children, brief psychological intervention, war exposure, group intervention, stress-related symptoms
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Israel, Male, Probability, Psychotherapy, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Warfare, Incidence, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review