Cited by 156Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorHormonal and reproductive studies

Testosterone has rewarding affective properties in male rats: implications for the biological basis of sexual motivation

Alexander, Gerianne M., Packard, Mark G., Hines, Melissa·1994·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Evidence from mammalian species, including humans, suggests that testosterone (T) enhances motivational aspects of sexual behavior, although the mechanism by which T exerts this effect is unknown. The hypothesis that increases in plasma T have rewarding affective properties was examined. Acute elevations of plasma T were induced in intact male rats by systemic administration of a recently developed testosterone-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complex that mimics pulsatile release of the hormone. In a conditioned-place-preference paradigm, rats displayed a preference for an environment previously paired with T administration (800 micrograms/kg and 1,200 micrograms/kg) as opposed to an environment paired with saline administration, indicating that T has rewarding affective properties. The findings suggest that T may enhance motivational aspects of mammalian sexual behavior by facilitating acquisition or expression of learned associations between environmental stimuli and sexual activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.424

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hormone-related changes sensitize the adolescent brain to reward.

    “It is thought that these hormone-related changes sensitize the adolescent brain to reward (Forbes and Dahl, 2010, Peper and Dahl, 2013), as appears to be the case in animal studies (Alexander et al., 1994, Clark et al., 1996, Miele et al., 1988).”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Alexander et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, G. M., Packard, M. G., & Hines, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1994
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
424-428
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W1974892244
Cited by
156
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f32hd007596-01)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD07596, R01HD024542, HD 24542)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
testosterone, sexual motivation, reward, conditioned place preference, male rats, pulsatile hormone secretion, learned associations, sexual behavior
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Male, Motivation, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Social Environment, Testosterone, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review