Cited by 27Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Clonidine antagonizes the aversive effects of opiate withdrawal and the rewarding effects of morphine only in opiate withdrawn rats

Nader, Karim, van der Kooy, Derek·1996·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The researchers asked whether clonidine, an alpha 2-noradrenergic agonist, would block selectively the motivational effects of opiate withdrawal and whether clonidine's effects would respect the boundary between nondeprived and deprived motivational states. In a place conditioning paradigm, clonidine (0.05 mg/kg ip) blocked the rewarding effects of morphine in opiate-withdrawn rats (as well as the aversive properties of withdrawal itself), but did not affect morphine place preferences (2 and 20 mg/kg) in drug-naive rats. Furthermore, clonidine blocked the acquisition of morphine (15 mg/kg), but not LiCl (15 mg/kg), conditioned taste aversions in water-deprived rats. The results suggest that the motivational system activated in deprived animals includes dopaminergic and noradrenergic components that are in series with each other.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.110.2.389

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Norepinephrine inhibition with an alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist blocked naloxone-precipitated conditioned place aversion in opioid-dependent rats.

    “Norepinephrine inhibition with an a 2 -adrenergic receptor agonist blocked naloxone-precipitated conditioned place aversion in opioid-dependent rats (Kosten, 1994;Nader and Van der Kooy, 1996).”

    From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Nader and Van der Kooy, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nader, K., & van der Kooy, D.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1996-04
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
389-400
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2014415375
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
clonidine, opioid withdrawal, morphine, conditioned place preference, conditioned taste aversion, motivational states, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, noradrenergic system, dopaminergic system, drug acquisition, water deprivation, aversive conditioning
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Animals, Arousal, Association Learning, Avoidance Learning, Clonidine, Conditioning, Classical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Morphine, Morphine Dependence, Motivation, Norepinephrine, Mental Recall, Social Environment, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Taste, Rats, Wistar, Lithium Chloride, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review