The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What needs to be explained to account for age-related effects on multiple cognitive variables?
Abstract
Structural equation methodology was used to investigate age-related influences across a number of cognitive variables in 204 adults ranging from 18 to 91 years of age with a hierarchical structure that contained 4 1st-order factors and 1 2nd-order common factor. Direct age relations were found to the common factor as well as to 1st-order speed and memory factors. Replicability of the findings was explored by investigating the same structure of age relations, using 2 different data sets, and a similar patten was found in each. These results suggest that at least 3 statistically distinct types of age-related influences are operating on a wide variety of cognitive variables and presumably require separate explanatory mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64 · Cited by 4,734 · cited 2×
“Furthermore, because the fit of a model can often be improved for theoretically irrelevant reasons, it may not be reasonable to treat such alternatives as meaningful unless they have a clear theoretical justification (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundResultHuman Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies
Carroll, J. B. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571312 · Cited by 4,121
Decomposing adult age differences in working memory
Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763 · Cited by 1,373
Self-citationIntelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior
Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0008 · Cited by 902
The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated.
GREENWOOD, P. M. (2000) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617700666092 · Cited by 311 · cited 2×
“…cortex (e.g., Cabeza, 2001; Esposito, Kirkby, Van Horn, Ellmore, & Berman, 1999; Raz, 2000); or (d) the quantity of neurotransmitters such as dopamine (e.g., Braver et al., 2001; Li, 2002; Prull, Gabrieli, & Bunge, 2000), or intactness of myelin (e.g., Greenwood, 2000; Peters et al., 1996).”
BackgroundStructural Factor Analysis Experiments with Incomplete Data
McArdle, J. J. (1994) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2904_5 · Cited by 198
Anstey, K. J., Luszcz, M. A., & Sanchez, L. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/56.1.p3 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience
Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1323 · Cited by 2,223
Memory and Executive Function in Aging and AD
Buckner, R. L. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.006 · Cited by 1,508
Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging
Damoiseaux, J. S., Beckmann, C. F., Arigita, E. J. S., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Rombouts, S. A. R. B. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm207 · Cited by 1,187
Executive Functioning as a Potential Mediator of Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Normal Adults.
Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566 · Cited by 1,057
Self-citationCognitive reserve and the neurobiology of cognitive aging
Whalley, L. J., Deary, I. J., Appleton, C. L., & Starr, J. M. (2004) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2004.05.001 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Salthouse, T. A., & Ferrer-Caja, E.
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-110
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W1980858895
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
