The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age-Related Differences in Responses to Thoughts of One’s Own Death: Mortality Salience and Judgments of Moral Transgressions
Open accessAbstract
Two experiments explored age differences in response to reminders of death. Terror management research has shown that death reminders lead to increased adherence to and defense of one's cultural worldview. In Study 1, the effect of mortality salience (MS) on evaluations of moral transgressions made by younger and older adults was compared. Whereas younger adults showed the typical pattern of harsher judgments in response to MS, older adults did not. Study 2 compared younger and older adults' responses to both the typical MS induction and a more subtle death reminder. Whereas younger adults responded to both MS inductions with harsher evaluations, older adults made significantly less harsh evaluations after the subtle MS induction. Explanations for this developmental shift in responses to reminders of death are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Age is negatively associated with MS effects and older adults exhibit the opposite impact of MS inductions by expressing more egalitarian views [28, 29].”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“After MS, older participants were lenient toward offenders, whereas younger participants were harsher.”
From When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management (2012) · cites this paper as Maxfield et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Maxfield et al. found that older adults reminded of death were more forgiving of moral transgressors.”
From When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management (2012) · cites this paper as Maxfield et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Thus, Maxfield et al. [142] found that, whereas younger adults reminded of death display a harsh defense of their moral code, older adults are more forgiving of moral transgressors after MS 1 .”
From An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes (2015) · cites this paper as [142]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When using age as a moderator, the impacts of MS attenuated and even reversed (e.g., greater levels of egalitarian attitudes emerged) in samples of older adults [e.g., 28, 29].”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
Erikson, E. H. (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18614668 · Cited by 13,081
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Bruνswik, E., Levinson, D. M., & Sandford, R. N. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220986.n8 · Cited by 6,460
John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x · Cited by 2,381
The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986) · Public Self and Private Self · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5_10 · Cited by 2,326
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization and compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Successful aging: Perspectives from behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
- Becker E. The denial of death. New York: Free Press; 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Rosenblatt A, Burling J, Lyon D. Assessing terror management analysis of self-esteem: Converging evidence of an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;63:913–922. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Martens A, Greenberg J, Schimel J. Effects of mortality salience on judgments of anxious and calm individuals. 2003 Manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson MM, Naccarato ME, Parker K. Assessing cognitive needs: The development of the Personal Need for Structure and Personal Fear of Invalidity Scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association; Nova Scotia, Canada. 1989. Jun, [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352321 · Cited by 1,188
Thirty Years of Terror Management Theory
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.03.001 · Cited by 509
Hayes, J., Schimel, J., Arndt, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020524 · Cited by 389
Grant, A. M., & WADE-BENZONI, K. A. (2009) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.44882929 · Cited by 231
When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management
Vail, K. E., Juhl, J., Arndt, J., Vess, M., Routledge, C., & Rutjens, B. T. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312440046 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., Kluck, B., Cox, C. R., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Weise, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Skidmore College (US)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 341-353
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- PMC
- PMC2396593
- OpenAlex
- W2038773980
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG022910)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- mortality salience, death reminders, age differences, moral judgment, moral transgression, terror management theory, older adults, developmental changes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Attitude to Death, Awareness, Culture, Defense Mechanisms, Denial, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Semantics, Social Values, Retrospective Moral Judgment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
