CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Initial validation of a computer-administered Addiction Severity Index: The ASI–MV.

Bultler, Stephen F., Budman, Simon H., Goldman, Risa J., Newman, Frederick J., Beckley, Kristen E., Trottier, Deborah, Cacciola, John S.·2001·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
DOI 10.1037/0893-164x.15.1.4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Addiction Severity Index--Multimedia Version (ASI-MV) is a CD-ROM-based simulation of the interviewer-administered Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Clients in treatment (N = 202) self-administered the ASI-MV to examine the test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and convergent-discriminant validity of the ASI-MV. Excellent test-retest reliability was observed for composite scores and severity ratings. Criterion validity, tested against the interviewer-administered ASI, was good for the composite scores. For severity ratings, variable agreement was observed between the ASI-MV and each interviewer, suggesting poor interrater reliability among interviewers. This conclusion was bolstered by a finding of superior convergent-discriminant validity for both composite scores and severity ratings compared to the standard ASI. The ASI-MV is a viable alternative to the expensive and potentially unreliable interviewer-administered version.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0893-164x.15.1.4

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. McLellan, 1985, Guide to the Addiction Severity Index: Background administration and field testing results.
  2. 1993, Assessing client needs using the ASI: A handbook for program administrators. (NIH Publication No. 93-3619).
  3. Navaline, 1994, An automated version of the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB): Enhancing the assessment of risk behaviors., AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 10, S281
  4. Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
  5. Ware, 1995, SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales.
  6. Zucker, 1996, The Antisocial Behavior Checklist (Version 2).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–127 of 127

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bultler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Goldman, R. J., Newman, F. J., Beckley, K. E., Trottier, D., & Cacciola, J. S.
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4-12
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
DOI
10.1037/0893-164x.15.1.4
OpenAlex
W2145888052
Cited by
127
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R44DA009938, 2R44DA09938)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Addiction Severity Index, self-report, addiction severity, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, inter-rater reliability, CD-ROM
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New England, Severity of Illness Index, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review