The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interparental Conflict and Adolescent Dating Relationships: Integrating Cognitive, Emotional, and Peer Influences.
Abstract
This study investigated the ways in which exposure to interparental conflict may affect adolescent dating relationships in a sample of 391 adolescents ages 14 to 18 years. Boys exposed to greater parental discord were more likely to view aggression as justifiable in a romantic relationship, had more difficulty managing anger, and believed that aggressive behavior was more common in their peers' dating relationships. Each of these variables in turn linked witnessing interparental conflict to higher levels of verbal and physical aggression toward their own romantic partners. Interparental conflict was not related to girls' aggressive behavior. These data support the value of targeting cognitive and emotional processes in prevention programs designed to reduce dating violence and suggest that such programs will be strengthened by focusing on peer influences as well.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“interparental conflict has more recently been linked to difficulties in relationships with siblings, peers, and romantic partners (Kinsfogel & Grych 2004; Parke et al., 2001; Steinberg, Davilla, & Fincham, 2006; Stocker & Richmond, 2007).”
From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Kinsfogel & Grych 2004
In the citing paper
“adolescents exposed to marital violence have more conflictual romantic relationships, more often use aggressive conflict styles, and more often view dating aggression as justifiable (Kinsfogel & Grych, 2004; Linder & Collins, 2005; Reitzel-Jaffe & Wolfe, 2001).”
From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Kinsfogel & Grych, 2004
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales
Straus, M. A. (1979) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351733 · Cited by 6,187
Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis.
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.387 · Cited by 1,866
Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework.
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.267 · Cited by 1,771
Self-citationAdvances in Personality Assessment
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315827612 · Cited by 1,245
Assessment of Anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale
Butcher, J. N., & Spielberger, C. D. (2013) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · doi:10.4324/9781315825656-12 · Cited by 1,239
Hamilton, J. (1987) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91977-5 · Cited by 1,046
Advances in personality assessment
Kline, P. (1983) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(83)90068-5 · Cited by 976
Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory.
Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Straatman, A.-L. (2001) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277 · Cited by 796
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Arbuckle, 1999, Amos 4.0 user's guide.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence
Capaldi, D. M., Knoble, N. B., Shortt, J. W., & Kim, H. K. (2012) · Partner Abuse · doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231 · Cited by 1,844
Adolescent Romantic Relationships
Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459 · Cited by 1,044
Bridgett, D. J., Burt, N. M., Edwards, E. S., & Deater-Deckard, K. D. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038662 · Cited by 730
Harold, G. T., & Sellers, R. (2018) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12893 · Cited by 383
Yule, K., Houston, J., & Grych, J. (2019) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-019-00293-1 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinsfogel, K. M., & Grych, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Marquette University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 505-515
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W2141858561
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- parental conflict, adolescent dating relationships, dating violence, anger management, peer influence, gender differences, prevention programs, cognitive and emotional processes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Awareness, Conflict, Psychological, Courtship, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Peer Group, Personality Development, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Parenting, Domestic Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
