Cited by 38Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in Measurement

The effects of context on the correspondence between observational ratings and questionnaire reports of hostile behavior: a multitrait, multimethod approach

Lorenz, Frederick O., Melby, Janet N., Conger, Rand D., Xu, Xia·2007·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

Scholars who study close relationships often measure the same concept with both observational ratings and questionnaire items. In studies where this has been done, the correlations between the two measures have often been low, and one reason may be a "context by measurement" confound. Observational ratings are usually based on behaviors during a specific task, whereas most questionnaire responses are based on a broader context such as "during the past month." In 2001, a total of 292 young couples were videotaped during a discussion task and asked to report on their own behavior and that of their partner during the discussion task and during the past month. The data were configured as a multitrait, multimethod matrix, and the magnitudes of the correlations were estimated with confirmatory factor analysis. The resulting correlations between observer ratings and questionnaire reports of hostile behavior during the videotaped discussion were roughly twice the magnitude of the correlations between observer rating and questionnaire reports during the past month. This suggests that the correspondence between behavioral categories and the content of questionnaire items is greater than previous studies have indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.498

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global rating scales have been used to show that marital interaction is related to satisfaction and other outcomes.

    “Several teams have used global rating scales to demonstrate the extent to which marital interaction is related to satisfaction and other outcomes 19, 30, 36.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorenz, F. O., Melby, J. N., Conger, R. D., & Xu, X.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
498-509
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2021369202
Cited by
38
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD047573, HD027724)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA05347)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH051361, MH00567; MH19734; MH43270; MH59355; MH62989; MH48165)
  • Bureau of Maternal and Child Health (MCJ- 109572)
  • MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
hostility, observer ratings, self-report questionnaire, multitrait-multimethod matrix, couples, close relationships
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Videotape Recording, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review