Cited by 128Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchEgo Development and Educational Practices

Adult development of intellectual performance: Description, explanation, and modification.

Baltes, Paul B., Labouvie, Gisela V.·1973·The psychology of adult development and aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10044-009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baltes, P. B., & Labouvie, G. V.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
The psychology of adult development and aging.
Published
1973
Pages
157-219
OpenAlex
W2492003869
Cited by
128
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
42.70
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
Keywords
adult development, cognitive performance, cognitive aging, intellectual development, cognitive change, cognitive enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review