Cited by 2,375Emotional Intelligence and PerformancePersonality Traits and PsychologySocial Skills and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10182-006

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,375

Metadata

Authors
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Emotion, disclosure, & health.
Published
1995
Pages
125-154
OpenAlex
W2285850553
Cited by
2,375
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 102
FWCI
31.27
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
emotional intelligence, Trait Meta-Mood Scale, emotional attention, emotional clarity, emotional repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review