Cited by 573Conflict Management and NegotiationContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science.

Lewin, Kurt·1997·American Psychological Association eBooks

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10269-000

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewin, K.
Corresponding author
Lewin, Kurt
Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Published
1997
OpenAlex
W2000007082
Cited by
573
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social conflict, conflict resolution, field theory, social science theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review