The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hurt feelings: The neglected emotion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although the experience of social rejection is commonly accompanied by reports of various emotions (e.g., fear, sadness, anger, anxiety, and shame), it is generally assumed that these feelings cumulatively give rise to a unique experience of ' social pain ' (35 -37).”
From Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain (2011) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–226 of 226
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.index
Lewandowska‐Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. (2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c2
Appendix 5. GRID features characterised by the arousal dimension
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.app5
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c13
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.ack
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.app1
Compassion, sympathy and empathy
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c5
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c7
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c6
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.intro
Shame, guilt, embarrassment and humiliation
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c11
Research methodology and materials
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c4
Appendix 6. GRID features characterised by the novelty dimension
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.app6
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.pre
Appendix 3. GRID features characterised by the valence dimension
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.app3
Appendix 4. GRID features characterised by the power dimension
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.app4
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c10
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.toc
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.app2
Love, Happiness, Joy, Contentment and Ecstasy
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c12
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c8
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.c9
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.prelim
(2026) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.80.refs
Professional Hurt: The Untold Stories
Brown, R. M. (2018) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Metadata
- Authors
- Leary, M. R., & Springer, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University (US)
- University of Memphis (US)
- ORCID
- Leary, Mark R.
- Venue
- Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 151-175
- OpenAlex
- W2498370358
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- hurt feelings, emotions, emotional neglect, emotional expression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review