On the sins of short-form development.
Abstract
The empirical short-form literature has been characterized by overly optimistic views of the transfer of validity from parent form to short form and by the weak application of psychometric principles in validating short forms. Reviewers have thus opposed constructing short forms altogether, implying researchers are succumbing to an inappropriate temptation by trying to abbreviate measures. The authors disagree. The authors do not oppose the development of short forms, but they do assert that the validity standards for short forms should be quite high. The authors identify 2 general and 9 specific methodological sins characterizing short-form construction and offer methodological suggestions for the sound development of short forms. They recommend a set of 6 a priori steps researchers should consider and 9 methodological procedures researchers can use to develop valid abbreviated forms of clinical-assessment procedures.
Cites (2)
- Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.Haynes, Stephen N., Richard, David C. S., Kubany, Edward S. · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
- A Short Form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumples ScalesSoldz, Stephen, Budman, Simon, Demby, Annette, Merry, Jocelyn · 1995 · Assessment
Cited by (42)
- The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality.Donnellan, M. Brent, Oswald, Frederick L., Baird, Brendan M., Lucas, Richard E. · 2006 · Psychological Assessment
- Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)Thompson, Edmund R. · 2007 · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David · 2019 · Psychological Assessment
- Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16Bjureberg, Johan, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Tull, Matthew T., Hedman, Erik, Sahlin, Hanna, Lundh, Lars-Gunnar, Bjärehed, Jonas, DiLillo, David, Messman-Moore, Terri, Gumpert, Clara Hellner et al. · 2016 · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Depressed Adults and Development of a Short FormBohlmeijer, Ernst, ten Klooster, Peter M., Fledderus, Martine, Veehof, Martine, Baer, Ruth · 2011 · Assessment
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the sins of short-form development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102
- The paper
- Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.