The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.
Abstract
In the context of the development of prototypic assessment instruments in the areas of cognition, personality, and adaptive functioning, the issues of standardization, norming procedures, and the important psychometrics of test reliability and validity are evaluated critically. Criteria, guidelines, and simple rules of thumb are provided to assist the clinician faced with the challenge of choosing an appropriate test instrument for a given psychological assessment. Clinicians are often faced with the critical challenge of choosing the most appropriate available test instrument for a given psychological assessment of a child, adolescent, or adult of a particular age, gender, and class of disability. It is the purpose of this report to provide some criteria, guidelines, or simple rules of thumb to aid in this complex scientific decision. As such, it draws upon my experience with issues of test development, standardization, norming procedures, and important psychometrics, namely, test reliability and validity. As I and my colleagues noted in an earlier publication, the major areas of psychological functioning, in the normal development of infants, children, adolescents, adults, and elderly people, include cognitive, academic, personality, and adaptive behaviors (Sparrow, Fletcher, & Cicchetti, 1985). As such, the major examples or applications discussed in this article derive primarily, although not exclusively, from these several areas of human functioning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A fair level of IRR was found (ICC = 0.44) (Cicchetti, 1994).”
From Blended care in the treatment of subthreshold symptoms of depression and psychosis in emerging adults: A randomised controlled trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily-Life (ACT-DL) (2020) · cites this paper as Cicchetti, 1994
In the citing paper
“Our analyses of peer review scores from NIH and AIBS applications across the complete range of quality indicate that peer review reliability is good with three reviewers, according to the cut-offs suggested by Cicchetti (1994).”
From When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review (2021) · cites this paper as Cicchetti (1994)
In the citing paper
“IRR estimates are above 0.6 which indicates good reviewer agreement.”
From When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review (2021) · cites this paper as Cicchetti, 1994
In the citing paper
“Interrater reliability was excellent (kappa ≥ .75) [36].”
From Mobile phone-based interventions for mental health: A systematic meta-review of 14 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
Cooper, A. M., & Michels, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,419
Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.
Wechsler, D. (1955) · Psychological Corp. eBooks · Cited by 4,941
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed
GROVE, W. A. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.12.1644-a · Cited by 3,756
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,086
Meier, A., Wurnig, M. C., Desbiolles, L., Leschka, S., Frauenfelder, T., & Alkadhi, H. (2015) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.094 · Cited by 86
Adherence to evidence-based guidelines among diabetes self-management apps
Breland, J. Y., Yeh, V. M., & Yu, J. (2013) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-013-0205-4 · Cited by 85
de Vries, A., Souman, J. L., de Ruyter, B., Heynderickx, I. E. J., & de Kort, Y. A. W. (2018) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.046 · Cited by 86
Comparing internal and external lead users as sources of innovation
Schweisfurth, T. G. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.002 · Cited by 85
Time and Space in Strategy Discourse: Implications for Intertemporal Choice
Crilly, D. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2687 · Cited by 88
Meerwijk, E. L., Ford, J. M., & Weiss, S. J. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.01.003 · Cited by 84
Stinchfield, R. D., McCready, J., Turner, N. E., Jiménez‐Múrcia, S., Petry, N. M., Grant, J. E., Welte, J. W., Chapman, H. A., & Winters, K. C. (2015) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7 · Cited by 84
Gaias, L. M., Johnson, S. L., Bottiani, J. H., Debnam, K. J., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.017 · Cited by 111
“Intraclass correlations (ICC) on the six dimensions across the three ASSIST observations ranged from .72 to .81, with an average of .75, indicating relatively little variability across the three cycles (Cicchetti, 1994).”
BackgroundMascareño, J., Rietzschel, E. F., & Wisse, B. M. (2019) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12341 · Cited by 89
“ICC3 indicated a good level of agreement (ICC3 = .77; Cicchetti, 1994).”
Hamacher, D., Hamacher, D., Taylor, W. R., Singh, N. B., & Schega, L. (2014) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.020 · Cited by 85
Schäffer, B., Schlittmeier, S. J., Pieren, R., Heutschi, K., Brink, M., Graf, R., & Hellbrück, J. (2016) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4949566 · Cited by 83
The order of disorder: Deconstructing visual disorder and its effect on rule-breaking.
Kotabe, H., Kardan, O., & Berman, M. G. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000240 · Cited by 87
Akpınar, P., Atıcı, A., Özkan, F. Ü., Aktaş, İ., Külcü, D. G., Sarı, A., & Durmus, B. (2017) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sc.2017.48 · Cited by 83
Kim, K. T. (2019) · Educational Sciences Theory & Practice · doi:10.12738/estp.2019.2.001 · Cited by 112
van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100665 · Cited by 83
“Originality was rated with a rating scheme by the two raters (ICC = .83, indicating excellent agreement; Cicchetti, 1994) on a five-point Likert scale.”
MethodInfluentialAccuracy of Three Commercial Wearable Devices for Sleep Tracking in Healthy Adults
Robbins, R., Weaver, M. D., Sullivan, J. P., Quan, S. F., Gilmore, K., Shaw, S., Benz, A., Qadri, S., Barger, L. K., Czeisler, C. A., et al. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24206532 · Cited by 83
“Concordance is deemed poor if the ICC is below 0.40, fair if between 0.40 and 0.59, good if between 0.60 and 0.74, and excellent if above 0.75 [23].”
BackgroundInfluentialClaes, C., Vandevelde, S., Hove, G. V., van Loon, J. H. M., Verschelden, G., & Schalock, R. L. (2012) · Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2012.00353.x · Cited by 84
Kurtz, J. E., & Parrish, C. L. (2001) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7602_12 · Cited by 83
Togher, L., Power, E., Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., & Rietdijk, R. (2010) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030903422478 · Cited by 83
Contreras, S., Fernandez, S., Malcarne, V., Ingram, R., & Vaccarino, V. (2004) · Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1177/0739986304269164 · Cited by 94
Zimmermann, J., Benecke, C., Hörz, S., Rentrop, M., Peham, D., Bock, A., Wallner, T., Schauenburg, H., Frommer, J., Huber, D., et al. (2013) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000076 · Cited by 82
Neural responses to functional and experiential ad appeals: Explaining ad effectiveness
Couwenberg, L. E., Boksem, M. A. S., Dietvorst, R. C., Worm, L., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., & Smidts, A. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.10.005 · Cited by 87
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Grading of Cartilaginous Bone Tumors
Fritz, B., Müller, D. A., Sutter, R., Wurnig, M. C., Wagner, M. W., Pfirrmann, C. W. A., & Fischer, M. A. (2018) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000000486 · Cited by 82
Bjørnvad, C. R., Gloor, S., Johansen, S. S., Sandøe, P., & Lund, T. B. (2019) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104730 · Cited by 82
“Depending on the source, these coefficients are considered excellent (Cicchetti, 1994) or good (Koo and Li, 2016).”
BackgroundWengler, K., He, X., Abi‐Dargham, A., & Horga, G. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116457 · Cited by 82
“The maximum ICC is 1, indicating perfect reliability, ICC over 0.75 indicates “excellent” reliability, ICC between 0.75 and 0.6 indicates “good” reliability, ICC between 0.6 and 0.4 indicates “fair” reliability, and ICC under 0.4 indicates “poor” reliability (Cicchetti, 1994).”
InfluentialWebb, S. J., Naples, A. J., Levin, A. R., Hellemann, G., Borland, H., Benton, J., Carlos, C., McAllister, T., Santhosh, M., Seow, H. Y., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.21050485 · Cited by 82
López-Fernández, O., Honrubia-Serrano, M. L., Baguley, T. S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.011 · Cited by 82
Validation of a New Measure of Prospective Memory: The Royal Prince Alfred Prospective Memory Test
Radford, K. A., Lah, S. S., Say, M. J., & Miller, L. A. (2010) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.529463 · Cited by 82
Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A meta-analysis of executive functioning
Hirst, R. B., Beard, C. L., Colby, K. A., Quittner, Z., Mills, B. M., & Lavender, J. M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.011 · Cited by 81
Test–retest reliability of five frequently used executive tasks in healthy adults
Soveri, A., Lehtonen, M., Karlsson, L. C., Lukasik, K., Antfolk, J., & Laine, M. (2018) · Applied Neuropsychology: Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2016.1263795 · Cited by 81
Forsberg, L., Forsberg, L. G., Lindqvist, H., & Helgason, Á. R. (2010) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/1747-597x-5-8 · Cited by 81
Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G. A., Dudek, C. M., & Hsu, L. M. (2013) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000041 · Cited by 81
Kraeima, J., Dorgelo, B., Gülbitti, H. A., Steenbakkers, R. J. H. M., Schepman, K., Roodenburg, J. L. N., Spijkervet, F. K. L., Schepers, R. H., & Witjes, M. J. H. (2018) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.03.013 · Cited by 81
Lang, D. G., Schott, B. H., van Ham, M., Morton, L., Kulikovskaja, L., Herrera‐Molina, R., Pielot, R., Klawonn, F., Montag, D., Jänsch, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-018-1242-1 · Cited by 77
Increasing quantity without compromising quality: How managerial framing affects intrapreneurship
Rigtering, C., Weitzel, U., & Muehlfeld, K. S. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.11.002 · Cited by 84
da Vitória, A. G., Oliveira, J. D. S. C., Pereira, L. C. D. A., de Faria, C. P., & José, J. F. B. D. S. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10282-1 · Cited by 81
Reisenzein, R., & Weber, H. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596544.007 · Cited by 84
The clinical utility of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in a clinical population.
Kleijweg, J. H. M., Verbraak, M. J. P. M., & van Dijk, M. K. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0031334 · Cited by 82
Martino, S., Paris, M., Anez, L. M., Nich, C., Canning‐Ball, M., Hunkele, K. A., Olmstead, T. A., & Carroll, K. M. (2016) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2016.04.005 · Cited by 81
A Meta-Analysis of Viewing Time Measures of Sexual Interest in Children
Schmidt, A. F., Babchishin, K. M., & Lehmann, R. (2016) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3 · Cited by 81
Measuring Shared Decision Making
Sepucha, K., & Scholl, I. (2014) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000350 · Cited by 80
Zander, E., Willfors, C., Berggren, S., Olsson, N. C., Coco, C., Elmund, A., Moretti, Å. H., Holm, A., Jifält, I., Kosieradzki, R., et al. (2015) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-015-0793-2 · Cited by 88
Core Items for a Standardized Resource Use Measure: Expert Delphi Consensus Survey
Thorn, J. C., BROOKES, S. T., Ridyard, C. H., Riley, R. A., Hughes, D. A., Wordsworth, S., Noble, S., Thornton, G., & Hollingworth, W. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.011 · Cited by 79
Reijgwart, M. L., Schoemaker, N. J., Pascuzzo, R., Leach, M. C., Stodel, M., de Nies, L., Hendriksen, C. F. M., van der Meer, M., Vinke, C. M., & van Zeeland, Y. R. A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187986 · Cited by 80
The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification
Uribe, J. S., Schwab, F. J., Mundis, G. M., Xu, D. S., Januszewski, J., Kanter, A. S., Okonkwo, D. O., Hu, S. S., Deviren, V., Eastlack, R. K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neurosurgery Spine · doi:10.3171/2018.4.spine171206 · Cited by 80
Reyes, A. D. L., Makol, B. A., Racz, S. J., Youngstrom, E. A., Lerner, M. D., & Keeley, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1238-6 · Cited by 80
Examining the influence of active ingredients of motivational interviewing on client change talk
Hurlocker, M. C., O'Sickey, A. J., Houck, J. M., & Moyers, T. B. (2018) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2018.10.001 · Cited by 81
Villagomez, A. N., Muñoz, F. M., Peterson, R. L., Colbert, A. M., Gladstone, M., MacDonald, B., Wilson, R., Fairlie, L., Gerner, G. J., Patterson, J. K., et al. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.027 · Cited by 80
“General guidelines [143] suggest that for measures of internal consistency (e.”
BackgroundGómez-Limón, J. A., Arriaza, M., & Guerrero-Baena, M. D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114398 · Cited by 88
“To interpret ICC, Cicchetti [63] gives some guidelines: <0.40, 0.40–0.59, 0.60–0.74, and >0.74 for poor, fair, good and excellent reliability, respectively.”
MethodInfluentialNissen, S. K., Fournaise, A., Lauridsen, J. T., Ryg, J., Nickel, C. H., Gudex, C. M., Brabrand, M., & Andersen‐Ranberg, K. (2020) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y · Cited by 86
Development and validation of the Kilifi Stigma Scale for Epilepsy in Kenya
Mbuba, C. K., Abubakar, A. A., Odermatt, P., Newton, C. R. J. C., & Carter, J. A. (2012) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.02.019 · Cited by 80
Mitcheson, L., Butor-Bhavsar, K., & McCambridge, J. (2009) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.11.001 · Cited by 80
Baylis, A. L., Chapman, K., & Whitehill, T. L. (2014) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1597/14-040 · Cited by 86
MacDonald, D. A., Dawson, A. P., & Hodges, P. W. (2011) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3410 · Cited by 80
Does mindfulness meditation increase empathy? An experiment
Ridderinkhof, A., de Bruin, E. I., Brummelman, E., & Bögels, S. M. (2017) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2016.1269667 · Cited by 87
A Novel Severity Assessment Scoring System for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hessam, S., Scholl, L., Sand, M. S., Schmitz, L., Reitenbach, S., & Bechara, F. G. (2018) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.5890 · Cited by 80
Kurtz, J. E., Lee, P. A., & Sherker, J. L. (1999) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319119900600201 · Cited by 79
Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible
Tunis, T. S., Sarig, R., Cohen, H., Medlej, B., Peled, N., & May, H. (2017) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1554-1 · Cited by 79
Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
Timmerman, H., Steegers, M. A. H., Huygen, F. J. P. M., Goeman, J. J., van Dasselaar, N. T., Schenkels, M. J., Wilder‐Smith, O. H. G., Wolff, A. P., & Vissers, K. C. P. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187961 · Cited by 79
Emotion regulation, conflict resolution, and spillover on subsequent family functioning.
Low, R. S. T., Overall, N. C., Cross, E. J., & Henderson, A. M. E. (2018) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000519 · Cited by 79
Effects of mental health interventions with Asian Americans: a review and meta-analysis
Huey, S. J., & Tilley, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000346 · Cited by 79
Polish Version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14): A Validity and Reliability Study in Three Samples
Surżykiewicz, J., Konaszewski, K., & Wagnild, G. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02762 · Cited by 93
Onishi, N., Sadinski, M., Hughes, M. C., Ko, E. S., Gibbs, P., Gallagher, K. M., Fung, M., Hunt, T. M., Martinez, D. F., Shukla‐Dave, A., et al. (2020) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13058-020-01292-9 · Cited by 79
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Lampi, E. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100387 · Cited by 110
Hundert, A. S., Birnie, K. A., Abla, O., Positano, K., Cassiani, C., Lloyd, S., Tiessen, P. H., Lalloo, C., Jibb, L., & Stinson, J. (2021) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000001017 · Cited by 85
Dahm, M. R., Cattanach, W., Williams, M., Basseal, J. M., Gleason, K. T., & Crock, C. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07768-y · Cited by 79
Lima, P. A. B., Falguera, F. P. S., da Silva, H. M. R., Maciel, S., Mariano, E. B., & Elgaaïed‐Gambier, L. (2023) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2023.2199668 · Cited by 88
“Since a coefficient of 0.60 or higher is generally considered to be a strong level of agreement (Cicchetti 1994; McHugh 2012), these results are acceptable.”
ResultInfluentialCognitive profile analysis: A shared professional myth.
Watkins, M. W. (2000) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/h0088802 · Cited by 82
Assessing fidelity in individual and family therapy for adolescent substance abuse
Hogue, A., Dauber, S., Chinchilla, P., Fried, A., Henderson, C., Inclan, J., Reiner, R. H., & Liddle, H. A. (2008) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.09.002 · Cited by 78
Interoception is Impaired in Children, But Not Adults, with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Nicholson, T., Williams, D., Carpenter, K., & Kallitsounaki, A. (2019) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-019-04079-w · Cited by 78
Thomson, K. M., Riosa, P. B., & Weiss, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2446-1 · Cited by 90
Development of the Motivational Interviewing Supervision and Training Scale.
Madson, M. B., Campbell, T. C., Barrett, D. E., Brondino, M. J., & Melchert, T. P. (2005) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.19.3.303 · Cited by 78
Are we Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y? A qualitative inquiry into generation cohorts in Malaysia
Ting, H., Lim, T., de Run, E. C., Koh, H., & Murni, S. (2017) · Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.004 · Cited by 77
Orri, M., Perret, L. C., Turecki, G., & Geoffroy, M. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.010 · Cited by 79
Hasegawa, N., Shah, V. V., Carlson‐Kuhta, P., Nutt, J. G., Horak, F. B., & Mancini, M. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19153320 · Cited by 77
“The ICC represents the test-retest reliability estimates, and the MDC represents the minimum amount of change that must take place for the difference to be considered “real” rather than measurement error [58,72]; thus, these values are very useful for clinical assessment.”
MethodTriage accuracy and causes of mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale
Moon, S.-H., Shim, J. L., Park, K.-S., & Park, C.-S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216972 · Cited by 77
A Deep Learning Approach for Meibomian Gland Atrophy Evaluation in Meibography Images
Wang, J., Yeh, T. N., Chakraborty, R., Yu, S. X., & Lin, M. C. (2019) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.8.6.37 · Cited by 78
Reliability of the DIERS Formetric 4D Spine Shape Parameters in Adults without Postural Deformities
Degenhardt, B. F., Starks, Z., & Bhatia, S. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/1796247 · Cited by 77
“ICC less than 0.40 indicated poor reliability, 0.4–0.59 indicated fair reliability, 0.6–0.74 indicated good reliability, and 0.75–1.0 indicated excellent reliability [23].”
InfluentialHuang, C., Kim, W., Zhang, Y., & Xiong, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17176050 · Cited by 77
“The interpretatio of ICC follows previous guidelines [57]: ICC < 0.”
MethodInfluentialMcGuire, J., Kugler, B. B., Park, J. M., Horng, B., Lewin, A., Murphy, T., & Storch, E. (2012) · Child Psychiatry and Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-012-0300-7
Psychological Measures As Predictors of Military Training Performance
Hartmann, E., Sunde, T., Kristensen, W., & Martinussen, M. (2003) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_17 · Cited by 82
Dolatowski, F. C., Adampour, M., Frihagen, F., Stavem, K., Utvåg, S. E., & Hoelsbrekken, S. E. (2016) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.3109/17453674.2016.1155253 · Cited by 77
Hayes, K., Holland, A. E., Pellegrino, V. A., Mathur, S., & Hodgson, C. L. (2018) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.002 · Cited by 77
Wei, E. H., Hipwell, A. E., Pardini, D. A., Beyers, J. M., & Loeber, R. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.027060 · Cited by 77
Cha, C. B., Tezanos, K. M., Peros, O. M., Ng, M. Y., Ribeiro, J. D., Nock, M. K., & Franklin, J. C. (2018) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12344 · Cited by 77
The field validity of Static-99/R sex offender risk assessment tool in California.
Hanson, R. K., Lunetta, A., Phenix, A., Neeley, J., & Epperson, D. L. (2014) · Journal of Threat Assessment and Management · doi:10.1037/tam0000014 · Cited by 79
Barham, M. P., Clark, G. M., Hayden, M. J., Enticott, P. G., Conduit, R., & Lum, J. A. G. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12888 · Cited by 76
Kao, S., Drollette, E. S., Ritondale, J. P., Khan, N. A., & Hillman, C. H. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.05.011 · Cited by 80
Gaining Insight Into Human Nature: A Review of Literature Classroom Intervention Studies
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318812914 · Cited by 76
Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice
Neely, C. L. C., Pedemonte, K. A., Boggs, K. N., & Flinn, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/60139 · Cited by 76
Validation of the clinical frailty score (CFS) in French language
Abraham, P. S., Courvoisier, D. S., Annweiler, C., Lenoir, C., MILLIEN, T., DALMAZ, F., Flaatten, H. K., Moreno, R. P., Christensen, S., de Lange, D. W., et al. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1315-8 · Cited by 82
Levin, A. R., Naples, A. J., Scheffler, A. W., Webb, S. J., Shic, F., Sugar, C. A., Murias, M., Bernier, R., Chawarska, K., Dawson, G., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2020.00021 · Cited by 76
“ICC values less than 0.40 are considered poor, between 0.40 and 0.59 fair, between 0.60 and 0.74 good, and between 0.75 and 1.00 excellent (Cicchetti, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialSandre, A., Banica, I., Riesel, A., Flake, J. K., Klawohn, J., & Weinberg, A. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.06.016 · Cited by 76
Age and environment-related differences in gait in healthy adults using wearables
Czech, M. D., Psaltos, D., Zhang, H., Adamusiak, T., Calicchio, M. L., Kelekar, A., Messere, A., Dijk, K. R. A. V., Ramos, V. F. M. L., Demanuele, C., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00334-y · Cited by 76
Adherence to Principles of Motivational Interviewing and Client Within-Session Behavior
Catley, D., Harris, K. J., Mayo, M. S., Hall, S., Okuyemi, K. S., Boardman, T., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2005) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465805002432 · Cited by 76
Greene, G. J., Andrews, R., Kuper, L. E., & Mustanski, B. S. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0210-1 · Cited by 84
Mental health screening in addiction, corrections and social service settings: Validating the MMS
Alexander, M. J., Haugland, G., Lin, S. P., Bertollo, D. N., & McCorry, F. A. (2008) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9100-x · Cited by 71
Jolstedt, M., Ljótsson, B., Fredlander, S., Tedgård, T., Hallberg, A., Ekeljung, A., Högström, J., Mataix-Cols, D., Serlachius, E., & Vigerland, S. (2018) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2017.11.003 · Cited by 75
Beyond the crisis: did the Ebola epidemic improve resilience of Liberia’s health system?
Ling, E. J., Larson, E., Macauley, R., Kodl, Y., VanDeBogert, B., Baawo, S., & Kruk, M. E. (2017) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czx109 · Cited by 81
Martino, J. C., Fowler, A. J., Doubleday, Z. A., Grammer, G. L., & Gillanders, B. M. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2553 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Cicchetti, D. V.
- Affiliations
- Veterans Health Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cicchetti, Domenic V.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 284-290
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2063085086
- Cited by
- 9,349
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 538 · 2025: 654 · 2024: 693 · 2023: 753 · 2022: 842 · 2021: 886 · 2020: 882 · 2019: 825 · 2018: 786 · 2017: 611 · 2016: 355 · 2015: 308 · 2014: 209 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 139
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- test selection, standardized assessment, test standardization, test norming, test reliability, test validity, psychometrics, test development, cognitive assessment, personality assessment, adaptive behavior, children and adolescents, adults, older adults, disability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review