The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.
Abstract
In the context of the development of prototypic assessment instruments in the areas of cognition, personality, and adaptive functioning, the issues of standardization, norming procedures, and the important psychometrics of test reliability and validity are evaluated critically. Criteria, guidelines, and simple rules of thumb are provided to assist the clinician faced with the challenge of choosing an appropriate test instrument for a given psychological assessment. Clinicians are often faced with the critical challenge of choosing the most appropriate available test instrument for a given psychological assessment of a child, adolescent, or adult of a particular age, gender, and class of disability. It is the purpose of this report to provide some criteria, guidelines, or simple rules of thumb to aid in this complex scientific decision. As such, it draws upon my experience with issues of test development, standardization, norming procedures, and important psychometrics, namely, test reliability and validity. As I and my colleagues noted in an earlier publication, the major areas of psychological functioning, in the normal development of infants, children, adolescents, adults, and elderly people, include cognitive, academic, personality, and adaptive behaviors (Sparrow, Fletcher, & Cicchetti, 1985). As such, the major examples or applications discussed in this article derive primarily, although not exclusively, from these several areas of human functioning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A fair level of IRR was found (ICC = 0.44) (Cicchetti, 1994).”
From Blended care in the treatment of subthreshold symptoms of depression and psychosis in emerging adults: A randomised controlled trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily-Life (ACT-DL) (2020) · cites this paper as Cicchetti, 1994
In the citing paper
“Our analyses of peer review scores from NIH and AIBS applications across the complete range of quality indicate that peer review reliability is good with three reviewers, according to the cut-offs suggested by Cicchetti (1994).”
From When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review (2021) · cites this paper as Cicchetti (1994)
In the citing paper
“IRR estimates are above 0.6 which indicates good reviewer agreement.”
From When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review (2021) · cites this paper as Cicchetti, 1994
In the citing paper
“Interrater reliability was excellent (kappa ≥ .75) [36].”
From Mobile phone-based interventions for mental health: A systematic meta-review of 14 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
Cooper, A. M., & Michels, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,419
Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.
Wechsler, D. (1955) · Psychological Corp. eBooks · Cited by 4,941
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed
GROVE, W. A. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.12.1644-a · Cited by 3,756
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,086 of 1,086
Validity of US norms for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III in Malawian children
Cromwell, E. A., Dube, Q., Cole, S. R., Chirambo, C. M., Dow, A., Heyderman, R. S., & Rie, A. V. (2014) · European Journal of Paediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.11.011 · Cited by 52
Forsberg, L., Källmén, H., Hermansson, U., Berman, A. H., & Helgason, Á. R. (2007) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070701339887 · Cited by 52
The usefulness of a self-report questionnaire measuring auditory verbal hallucinations
Kim, S. H., Jung, H. Y., Hwang, S. S., Chang, J. S., Kim, Y., Ahn, Y. M., & Kim, Y. S. (2010) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.005 · Cited by 51
Gaume, J., Magill, M., Longabaugh, R., Bertholet, N., Gmel, G., & Daeppen, J.-B. (2014) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.12469 · Cited by 47
Bringing chronic-pain care to rural veterans: A telehealth pilot program description.
Glynn, L. H., Chen, J. A., Dawson, T. C., Gelman, H., & Zeliadt, S. B. (2021) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000408 · Cited by 40
The development of narcissistic admiration and machiavellianism in early adulthood.
Grosz, M. P., Göllner, R., Rose, N., Spengler, M., Trautwein, U., Rauthmann, J. F., Wetzel, E., & Roberts, B. W. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000174 · Cited by 45
Kodish, S. R., Bio, F., Oemcke, R., Conteh, J., Beauliere, J. M., Pyne-Bailey, S., Rohner, F., Ngnie-Teta, I., Jalloh, M. B., & Wirth, J. P. (2019) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0007645 · Cited by 44
Shen, B., Wu, B., Abdullah, T. B., Zhan, G., Lian, Q., Vania Apkarian, A., & Huang, L. (2018) · Molecular Pain · doi:10.1177/1744806918755283 · Cited by 44
“9 as excellent.(46) Concurrent validity was assessed by Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R) with other pain-related measurements.”
MethodSommers-Spijkerman, M., Trompetter, H., ten Klooster, P., Schreurs, K., Gilbert, P., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000514 · Cited by 43
Lewis, E. J., Blanco, I., Raila, H., & Joormann, J. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000535 · Cited by 43
Validation of a short form Three Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (TFMQ-SF) in pregnant women
Truijens, S. E. M., Nyklíček, I., van Son, J., & Pop, V. J. M. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.037 · Cited by 41
Bartlett, L., Lovell, P., Otahal, P., & Sanderson, K. (2017) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0643-4 · Cited by 42
Linking metacognition and mindreading: Evidence from autism and dual-task investigations.
Nicholson, T., Williams, D. M., Lind, S. E., Grainger, C., & Carruthers, P. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000878 · Cited by 42
Bello, N. A., Schwartz, J. E., Kronish, I. M., Oparil, S., Anstey, D. E., Wei, Y., Cheung, Y. K. K., Muntner, P., & Shimbo, D. (2018) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.118.008658 · Cited by 42
Muir, N. M., Viljoen, J. L., Jonnson, M. R., Cochrane, D. M., & Rogers, B. J. (2020) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000816 · Cited by 41
Forsberg, L. G., Ernst, D., Sundqvist, K., & Farbring, C. Å. (2011) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826084.2011.591880 · Cited by 40
Simpson, P. A., Mars, T., & Esteves, J. E. (2017) · International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2017.03.001 · Cited by 38
van Zijl, F. V. W. J., Timman, R., & Datema, F. R. (2017) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4486-y · Cited by 40
Overall and differential attrition in mindfulness-based interventions: A meta-analysis
Lam, S. U., Kirvin-Quamme, A., & Goldberg, S. B. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-01970-z · Cited by 39
“Interrater reliabilities for inclusion at title and/or abstract and full text levels were good to excellent (i.e., ICC ≥ 0.60; Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodInfluentialAutism Severity as a Predictor of Comorbid Conditions
Jang, J., & Matson, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-015-9421-9 · Cited by 39
Rheker, J., Andersson, G., & Weise, C. (2015) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2015.03.007 · Cited by 38
Hall, G. C. N., Kim-Mozeleski, J. E., Zane, N. W., Sato, H., Huang, E. R., Tuan, M., & Ibaraki, A. Y. (2019) · Asian American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1037/aap0000122 · Cited by 36
Medical history of discordant twins and environmental etiologies of autism
Willfors, C., Carlsson, T., Anderlid, B.-M., Nordgren, A., Kostrzewa, E., Berggren, S., Ronald, A., Kuja-Halkola, R., Tammimies, K., & Bölte, S. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.269 · Cited by 35
Papas, R. K., Gakinya, B. N., Mwaniki, M. M., Lee, H., Keter, A. K., Martino, S., Klein, D. A., Liu, T., Loxley, M. P., Sidle, J. E., et al. (2021) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15112 · Cited by 37
“067) so did not require controlling for the grouping effect in the final analysis (59).”
BackgroundCan cognitive insight predict symptom remission in a first episode psychosis cohort?
O’Connor, J. A., Ellett, L., Ajnakina, O., Schoeler, T., Kollliakou, A., Trotta, A., Wiffen, B. D., Falcone, A. M., Di Forti, M., Murray, R. M., et al. (2017) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1210-9 · Cited by 37
Talwalkar, J. S., Murtha, T. D., Prozora, S., Fortin, A. H., Morrison, L. J., & Ellman, M. S. (2020) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1704763 · Cited by 32
Carlone, C., Milan, S., Decoste, C., Borelli, J. L., McMahon, T. J., & Suchman, N. E. (2023) · Infant Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1002/imhj.22046 · Cited by 35
Bossie, C. A., Alphs, L. D., & Correll, C. U. (2015) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/yic.0000000000000082 · Cited by 33
Campos-Melady, M., Smith, J. E., Meyers, R. J., Godley, S. H., & Godley, M. D. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000216 · Cited by 28
Hovdenak Jakobsen, I., Jeppesen, M. M., Simard, S., Thaysen, H. V., Laurberg, S., & Juul, T. (2018) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-018-0709-5 · Cited by 32
Bani‐Issa, W., Radwan, H., Saqan, R., Hijazi, H., Fakhry, R., Alameddine, M., Naja, F., Ibrahim, A., Lin, N., Naing, Y. T., et al. (2023) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13666 · Cited by 30
“Values of 0.40–0.59 are considered fair reliability, 0.60–0.74 good reliability, and >0.75 excellent reliability (Cicchetti, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialAdolescents’ definitions of bullying: The contribution of age, gender, and experience of bullying.
Byrne, H., Dooley, B., Fitzgerald, A., & Dolphin, L. (2016) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0271-8 · Cited by 31
Application of representative learning design for assessment of common practice tasks in tennis
Krause, L., Farrow, D., Buszard, T., Pinder, R., & Reid, M. (2019) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.008 · Cited by 30
Sansavini, A., Guarini, A., Zuccarini, M., Lee, J. Z., Faldella, G., & Iverson, J. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02131 · Cited by 30
“75 are considered an index of excellent agreement both for ICC and Cohen’s Kappa (Cicchetti, 1994).”
InfluentialPantalon, M. V., Martino, S., Dziura, J., Li, F.-Y., Owens, P. H., Fiellin, D. A., O'Connor, P. G., & D'Onofrio, G. (2012) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.011 · Cited by 30
“75 or above are excellent (Cicchetti, 1994).”
parental psychological factors and quality of life of children with inflammatory bowel disease
Bramuzzo, M., De Carlo, C., Arrigo, S., Pavanello, P. M., Canaletti, C., Giudici, F., Agrusti, A., Martelossi, S., Di Leo, G., & Barbi, E. (2020) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000002548 · Cited by 28
Erosheva, E. A., Martinková, P., & Lee, C. J. (2021) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/rssa.12681 · Cited by 28
“For psychological assessment, Cicchetti (1994) provides the following recommendation: IRR values below 0.4, between 0.4 and 0.59, between 0.6 and 0.74, and 0.75 or above are indicative of poor, fair, good, and excellent reliability, respectively.”
BackgroundInfluentialLinguistic complexity as the predictor of EFL independent and integrated writing quality
Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, J. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100727 · Cited by 28
Dajani, D. R., Odriozola, P., Winters, M., Voorhies, W., Marcano, S., Baez, A., Gates, K. M., Dick, A. S., & Uddin, L. Q. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01536 · Cited by 27
“Established guidelines were used to interpret ICC values: poor (<.40), fair (.40–.59), good (.60–.74), and excellent (.75–1.00; Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodInfluentialvan Aken, M., Oosterman, J., van Rijn, T., Woudsma, K., Ferdek, M., Ruigt, G., Kozicz, T., Braat, D., Peeters, A., & Nap, A. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.040 · Cited by 26
Stirman, S. W., Gutner, C. A., Gamarra, J., Suvak, M. K., Vogt, D., Johnson, C., Wachen, J. S., Dondanville, K. A., Yarvis, J. S., Mintz, J., et al. (2021) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2020.08.005 · Cited by 24
Martino, S., Zimbrean, P., Forray, A., Kaufman, J. S., Desan, P. H., Olmstead, T. A., Gilstad-Hayden, K., Gueorguieva, R., & Yonkers, K. A. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05257-3 · Cited by 24
Cruwys, T., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Rathbone, J. A., & Donaldson, J. L. (2022) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2022.06.011 · Cited by 23
Wilson, S. M., Eriksson, D. K., Yen, M., Demarco, A. T., Schneck, S. M., & Lucanie, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-l-rsnp-19-0031 · Cited by 25
“Dice coefficients are conceptually related to the kappa statistic and can be interpreted as poor ( .40), fair (.40–.60), good (.60–.75), or excellent (≥ .75), following Cicchetti (1994).”
BackgroundBioscience-scale automated detection of figure element reuse
Acuna, D. E., Brookes, P. S., & Kording, K. P. (2018) · doi:10.1101/269415 · Cited by 54
Short-Term Meditation Training Fosters Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: A Pilot Study
Fazia, T., Bubbico, F., Iliakis, I., Salvato, G., Berzuini, G., Bruno, S., & Bernardinelli, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558803 · Cited by 22
“Questionnaire internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach’s α coefficients (Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodEnhanced memory for negative social information in borderline personality disorder.
Niedtfeld, I., Renkewitz, F., Mädebach, A., Hillmann, K., Kleindienst, N., Schmahl, C., & Schulze, L. (2020) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000540 · Cited by 22
Allegiance effects in mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A meta-re-analysis
Goldberg, S. B., & Tucker, R. P. (2020) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2019.1664783 · Cited by 21
“The initial agreement was good (ICC = .85; Cicchetti, 1994).”
BackgroundSelf-Focused Attention and Depressive Symptoms in Adults with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Burns, A., Irvine, M., & Woodcock, K. (2019) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3732-5 · Cited by 20
Giromini, L., Brusadelli, E., Di Noto, B., Grasso, R., & Lang, M. (2015) · Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/02668734.2015.1006666 · Cited by 22
Improving Medical Residents’ Self-Assessment of Their Diagnostic Accuracy: Does Feedback Help?
Kuhn, J., van den Berg, P., Mamede, S., Zwaan, L., Bindels, P., & van Gog, T. (2022) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-021-10080-9 · Cited by 21
“Each diagnosis was rated by two general practitioners with an ‘excellent’ interrater reliability, ICC = 0.96 (Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodInfluentialvan Hooff, M., Meijer, E. J., Scheltinga, M. R. M., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., & Schep, G. (2022) · Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · doi:10.1111/cpf.12738 · Cited by 20
“The ICC values were interpreted following the criteria of Landis and Koch: 0.00 poor, 0.00–0.20 slight, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 substantial and 0.81–1.00 almost perfect reliability (Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodInfluentialHerkert, C., Kraal, J. J., van Loon, E. M. A., van Hooff, M., & Kemps, H. M. C. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/15045 · Cited by 19
“An ICC below 0.4 was considered poor, between 0.4 and 0.59 fair, between 0.6 and 0.74 good, and above 0.75 was considered as excellent reliability [34].”
BackgroundInfluentialMarkowitz, D. M. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02344-0 · Cited by 19
Al-Dajani, N., Uliaszek, A. A., & Hamdullahpur, K. (2019) · Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation · doi:10.1186/s40479-019-0112-5 · Cited by 18
Patil, K., Ricciuto, A., Alsharief, A., Al‐Rayahi, J., Amirabadi, A., Church, P. C., Kamath, B. M., & Greer, M. C. (2020) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1002/hep4.1454 · Cited by 18
Hanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. (2021) · Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work · doi:10.1080/26408066.2020.1833803 · Cited by 16
Low, D. M., Rao, V., Randolph, G., Song, P. C., & Ghosh, S. S. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000516 · Cited by 16
Psychometric analysis of the Swedish panic disorder severity scale and its self-report version
Svensson, M., Nilsson, T., Johansson, H., Viborg, G., Perrin, S., & Sandell, R. (2019) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2018.1554699 · Cited by 16
“Cicchetti’s [37] criteria were used for interpretation of inter-rater agreement estimates: less than 0.”
MethodZeljic, K., Zhang, Y., Qiu, X., Chen, X., Gong, H., Jin, H., Zhang, C., & Storch, E. A. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.34.1.58 · Cited by 15
“Convergent validity with the WHODAS 2.0 was interpreted based on the following conventions: > .50 = good, .30–.49 = fair, and .10– .29 = poor, with inverse intervals used to categorize divergent validity: .10–.29 = good, .30–.49 = fair, and > .50 = poor (Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodInfluentialThe impact of motivational interviewing on communication of patients undergoing periodontal therapy.
Kitzmann, J., Ratka‐Krueger, P., Vach, K., & Woelber, J. P. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13132 · Cited by 15
Serowik, K. L., Khan, A. J., LoCurto, J., & Orsillo, S. M. (2018) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-018-9679-1 · Cited by 15
Responsibility causes reassurance seeking, too: An experimental investigation
Leonhart, M. W., & Radomsky, A. S. (2019) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.10.005 · Cited by 15
Edmunds, S. R., Colman, C., Vidal, P., & Faja, S. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05049-x · Cited by 14
Cederberg, J. T., Weineland, S., Dahl, J., & Ljungman, G. (2018) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.09.004 · Cited by 13
Psychometric Properties of the Academic Encouragement Scale in Chinese University Students
Tang, H., Huo, Z., Liu, C., Liu, Z., & Wong, Y. J. (2021) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282920966821 · Cited by 13
“An ICC higher than .60 was considered acceptable (Cicchetti, 1994).”
BackgroundRiley-Behringer, M., Davis, M. M., Werner, J. J., Fagnan, L. J., & Stange, K. C. (2017) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2017.305 · Cited by 12
Feliu‐Soler, A., Pérez‐Aranda, A., Andrés‐Rodríguez, L., Butjosa, A., Díaz, N. S., Trujols, J., Núñez, C., Stephan‐Otto, C., Rozadilla‐Sacanell, A., Serrano‐Blanco, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research · doi:10.1111/jabr.12134 · Cited by 12
Ishikawa, S.-I., Romano, M., & Hudson, J. L. (2022) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2021.05.008 · Cited by 11
Assessing in-session rumination and its effects on CBT for depression
Kennedy, J. C., Dunlop, B. W., Craighead, L. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Mayberg, H. S., & Craighead, W. E. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104209 · Cited by 11
de Krijger, E., Willems, R., ten Klooster, P., Bakker, E., Miedema, H., Drossaert, C., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895850 · Cited by 11
“Internal consistency was considered adequate when above 0.70 (Cicchetti, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialPsychometric properties of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in females with fibromyalgia
Luque-Reca, O., Gillanders, D., Catala, P., & Peñacoba, C. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02214-4 · Cited by 8
“In those participants who answered the scale again after two months (n = 62), the intraclass correlation coefficient (abbreviated as the ICC) was used to explore test-retest reliability, considering values ≥ .70 as adequate (Cicchetti, 1994).”
MethodOccupational physical activity in brewery and office workers
Thompson, J. F., Severson, R. L., & Rosecrance, J. C. (2018) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1492136 · Cited by 9
Gharraee, B., Shabani, A., Masoumian, S., Zamirinejad, S., Yaghmaeezadeh, H., Khanjani, S., & Ghahremani, S. (2021) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-670472/v1 · Cited by 9
Steinberg, N., Moshe-Cohen, R., Sheena, L., & Kivity, Y. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04963-w · Cited by 8
“The Pearson’s r correlation between the BRFI scores of the two coders was r = .87 and the Intra Class Correlation (2, 1) was 0.79 which is considered above good (Cicchetti, 1994).”
InfluentialListening to and believing derogatory and threatening voices
Sheaves, B., Johns, L., Loe, B. S., Bold, E., Černis, E., Panel, T. M. H. V. L. E. A., Molodynski, A., & Freeman, D. (2023) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbac101 · Cited by 8
Zhang, C. C., McGuire, J. F., Qiu, X., Jin, H., Li, Z., Cepeda, S., Goodman, W. K., & Storch, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.11.006 · Cited by 7
Pantalon, M. V., Dziura, J., Li, F.-Y., Owens, P. H., O'Connor, P. G., & D'Onofrio, G. (2017) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/08897077.2017.1294548 · Cited by 7
Alasmari, D., Alkhalaf, M. S., Alqahtani, S. M., Alqhtani, N. R., Alqahtani, A. S., Gufran, K., & Alotaibi, Y. K. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214703 · Cited by 7
“Educational applications could deliver a mass of health information to a wider audience because of the popularity and advancement of smartphones in the current era [14,26,30,33].”
BackgroundBarakat, Z., Sacre, H., Khatib, S., Hajj, A., BouMalham, C., Haddad, C., Zeenny, R. M., Akel, M., Abbas, L. A., Barakat, M., et al. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322554 · Cited by 6
“ICC values can range between 0 and 1, with scores between 0.40 and 0.59 indicating fair agreement, 0.60 to 0.74 indicating good agreement, and 0.75 to 1 indicating excellent agreement [60].”
InfluentialBarriers and facilitators to implementation of BEST in CLASS
Granger, K. L., Sutherland, K. S., Conroy, M. A., Hetrick, A. A., & Parnell, E. (2020) · Exceptionality · doi:10.1080/09362835.2020.1727335 · Cited by 5
Amin Mohammadian, M., Mozayyany, H., Bagheri Koudakani, S., & Maloney, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112338 · Cited by 5
Intra-Reliability of a Wearable Near-Infrared Sensor for Monitoring the Intensity of Exercise
Michalik, K., Smolarek, M., Nowak, M., Pueo, B., & Żmijewski, P. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14135856 · Cited by 3
Development and validation of a Japanese version of the Teachers Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
Koh, Y., Iwasawa, N., Inoue, K., & Ohtsuki, T. (2024) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100726 · Cited by 1
Mahy, T., & Li, H. (2026) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2623216 · Cited by 2
“The Cronbach’s a coefficients ranged from 0.71 to 0.92 across five subscales in subsample A2 and subsample B (Table 5), consistently higher than the conventionally acceptable standard (i.e., 0.70) (Cicchetti, 1994).”
InfluentialLearning gains from a one-day training in acceptance-based behavior therapy
Gu, G., Roemer, L., Suvak, M., Liverant, G., & Orsillo, S. M. (2021) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2020.1829026
“These ICCs suggest that inter-coder reliability was good to excellent (Cicchetti, 1994; Koo & Li, 2016).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cicchetti, D. V.
- Affiliations
- Veterans Health Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cicchetti, Domenic V.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 284-290
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2063085086
- Cited by
- 9,349
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 538 · 2025: 654 · 2024: 693 · 2023: 753 · 2022: 842 · 2021: 886 · 2020: 882 · 2019: 825 · 2018: 786 · 2017: 611 · 2016: 355 · 2015: 308 · 2014: 209 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 139
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- test selection, standardized assessment, test standardization, test norming, test reliability, test validity, psychometrics, test development, cognitive assessment, personality assessment, adaptive behavior, children and adolescents, adults, older adults, disability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review