The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research.
Abstract
Research on effectiveness of school bullying interventions has lagged behind descriptive studies on this topic. The literature on bullying intervention research has only recently expanded to a point that allows for synthesis of findings across studies. The authors conducted a meta-analytic study of school bullying intervention research across the 25-year period from 1980 through 2004, identifying 16 studies that met our inclusion criteria. These studies included 15,386 K through 12 student participants from European nations and the United States. Applying standard meta-analysis techniques to obtain averaged effect size estimates across similar outcomes, the authors found that the intervention studies produced meaningful and clinically important positive effects for about one-third of the variables. The majority of outcomes evidenced no meaningful change, positive or negative. The authors conclude that school bullying interventions may produce modest positive outcomes; that they are more likely to influence knowledge, attitudes, and self-perceptions rather than actual bullying behaviors; and that the majority of outcome variables in intervention studies are not meaningfully impacted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S. S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.450 · Cited by 884
Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention
Olweus, D. (1997) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03172807 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 · Cited by 2,334
Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/a0020149 · Cited by 1,758
Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 · Cited by 1,624
The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice.
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., Hawley, P. H., Jacobs, W. J., James, J., Volk, A. A., et al. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026220 · Cited by 745
What Can Be Done About School Bullying?: Linking Research to Educational Practice
Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09357622 · Cited by 672
Metadata
- Authors
- Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M.
- Venue
- School Psychology Quarterly
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-42
- ISSN
- 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1560
- OpenAlex
- W2131306848
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26
- The paper
- Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.