Cited by 146Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The role of irrational beliefs in perfectionism.

Ellis, Albert·2002·Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10458-009

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, A.
Affiliations
Albert Ellis Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Albert
Venue
Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment.
Published
2002
Pages
217-229
OpenAlex
W2492990040
Cited by
146
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.46
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
irrational beliefs, perfectionism, cognitive distortions, cognitive therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review