CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 320Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grounded theory in psychological research.

Henwood, Karen, Pidgeon, Nick·2003·Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.
DOI 10.1037/10595-008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10595-008

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 320

Related

Metadata

Authors
Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Published
2003
Pages
131-155
DOI
10.1037/10595-008
OpenAlex
W1896284128
Cited by
320
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
39.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
grounded theory, qualitative research methodology, theory development, psychological research methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review