Cited by 185Mental Health Research TopicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health Interventions

The feasibility of using cellular phones to collect ecological momentary assessment data: Application to alcohol consumption.

Collins, R. Lorraine, Kashdan, Todd B., Gollnisch, Gernot·2003·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The limitations of paper-and-pencil self-monitoring (PM) are leading to the use of more sophisticated techniques. PM was compared with cellular phone monitoring (CM) to collect ecological momentary assessment data on alcohol use. Twenty social drinkers were randomly assigned to the 2 groups, and their drinking was monitored for 14 days. PM participants recorded data on cards. CM participants carried telephones and responded to an interactive voice response system. The authors found few significant group differences in alcohol use, compliance with the self-monitoring, and satisfaction. However, CM had useful advantages, including instantaneous entry of data into a central database, date and time stamping of data, and easy integration into daily life. Although preliminary, this study suggests that CM is a promising alternative to PM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.73

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, R. L., Kashdan, T. B., & Gollnisch, G.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2003-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
73-78
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2124478199
Cited by
185
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R01-07595)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, alcohol consumption, self-monitoring, interactive voice response, compliance, participant satisfaction, social drinkers, data collection feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Consumer Behavior, Data Collection, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Social Environment, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review