Cited by 20Smoking Behavior and CessationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Effects of cigarette smoking and smoking deprivation on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance

Lyvers, Michael, Maltzman, Irving, Miyata, Yo·1994·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1064-1297.2.3.283

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyvers, M., Maltzman, I., & Miyata, Y.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1994-08
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
283-289
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2046123515
Cited by
20
References
32
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
cigarette smoking, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, executive function, cognitive performance, nicotine withdrawal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review