CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stress management interventions in the Dutch domiciliary care sector: Findings from 81 organizations.

Taris, Toon W., Kompier, Michiel A. J., Geurts, Sabine A. E., Schreurs, Paul J. G., Schaufeli, Wilmar B., de Boer, Elpine, Sepmeijer, Kees Jan, Watterz, Cobie·2003·International Journal of Stress Management
DOI 10.1037/1072-5245.10.4.297
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 64300.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1072-5245.10.4.297

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1037/1072-5245.10.1.16 · DOI
  2. Dawis, 1984, A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications.
  3. DeFrank. Worksite stress management interventions: Their effectiveness and conceptualisation. 2 4 1987 · DOI
  4. Frese, 1994, Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies., 375
  5. 10.1111/1468-246X.00106 · DOI
  6. Gründemann, 1997, Preventing absenteeism at the workplace: European research report.
  7. Hacker, 1986, Arbeits psychologie
  8. Hackman, 1980, Work redesign.
  9. Heaney, 2003, Worksite health interventions: Targets for change and strategies for attaining them., 305, 10.1037/10474-015 · DOI
  10. Kahn, 1964, Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity.
  11. Karasek, 1990, Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life.
  12. Karasiek, 1985, Job Content Instrument: Questionnaire and user's guide (Rev. 1.1).
  13. Kompier, 2002, Job design and well-being., 429, 10.1002/0470013400.ch20 · DOI
  14. Kompier, (in press). Dealing with workplace stress.
  15. Kompier, 2001, Organizational work stress interventions in a theoretical, methodological and practical context., 164
  16. 10.1080/135943200417975 · DOI
  17. Maslach, 1993, Burnout: A multi-dimensional perspective., 19
  18. Merllie, 2001, Ten years of working conditions in the European Union.
  19. 2000, Covenants on health and safety at work.
  20. Murphy, 1988, Workplace interventions for stress reduction and prevention., 301
  21. Murphy, 1996, Stress management in working settings: A critical review of the health effects., American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 112, 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.112 · DOI
  22. Newman, 1979, Personal and organizational strategies for handling job stress: A review., Personnel Psychology, 32, 1, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb00467.x · DOI
  23. 10.1023/A:1009549312628 · DOI
  24. Schaufeli, 1996, Maslach Burnout Inventory-General survey (MBI-GS).
  25. Schaufeli, 1998, The burnout companion to study and practice: A critical analysis.
  26. Semmer, 2003, Job stress interventions and organization of work., 325, 10.1037/10474-016 · DOI
  27. Siegist, 2000, A theory of occupational stress., 52
  28. Van Veldhoven. 1997 · DOI
  29. Warr, 1996, Employee well-being., 224

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Geurts, S. A. E., Schreurs, P. J. G., Schaufeli, W. B., de Boer, E., Sepmeijer, K. J., & Watterz, C.
Venue
International Journal of Stress Management
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2003-11
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
297-325
ISSN
  • 1573-3424
  • 1072-5245
DOI
10.1037/1072-5245.10.4.297
Cited by
31
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review