The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being.
Abstract
The authors analyzed data from the 2002 National Study of the Changing Workforce (N = 3,504) to investigate relationships among availability of formal organizational family support (family benefits and alternative schedules), job autonomy, informal organizational support (work-family culture, supervisor support, and coworker support), perceived control, and employee attitudes and well-being. Using hierarchical regression, the authors found that the availability of family benefits was associated with stress, life satisfaction, and turnover intentions, and the availability of alternative schedules was not related to any of the outcomes. Job autonomy and informal organizational support were associated with almost all the outcomes, including positive spillover. Perceived control mediated most of the relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Case-finding instruments for depression: Two questions are as good as many
Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x · Cited by 1,826
Marmot, M., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E., & Stansfeld, S. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04244-x · Cited by 1,291
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002 · Cited by 1,269
The Role of Acceptance and Job Control in Mental Health, Job Satisfaction, and Work Performance
Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1057 · Cited by 711
Cited by
Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Yragui, N. L., Bodner, T. E., & Hanson, G. C. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308328510 · Cited by 807
Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review
Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D.-J. (2018) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-017-9509-8 · Cited by 574
Kelly, E. L., Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Durham, M., Bray, J. W., Chermack, K., Murphy, L. A., & Kaskubar, D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520802211610 · Cited by 477
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Anderson, A. J., Kaplan, S. A., & Vega, R. P. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2014.966086 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-118
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W1992422985
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 83.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.100
- The paper
- Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
