The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum.
Abstract
While researchers are increasingly interested in understanding the boundaries surrounding the work and personal life domains, few have tested the propositions set forth by theory. Boundary theory proposes that individuals manage the boundaries between work and personal life through processes of segmenting and/or integrating the domains. The authors investigated boundary management profiles of 332 workers in an investigation of the segmentation-integration continuum. Cluster analysis indicated consistent clusters of boundary management practices related to varying segmentation and integration of the work and personal life domains. But, the authors suggest that the segmentation-integration continuum may be more complicated. Results also indicated relationships between boundary management practices and work-personal life interference and work-personal life enhancement. Less flexible and more permeable boundaries were related to more interference, while more flexible and more permeable boundaries were related to more enhancement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research.
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278 · Cited by 2,767
Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress and family satisfaction
Chesley, N. (2005) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x · Cited by 506
Cited by
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Boundary management and work-nonwork balance while working from home
Allen, T. D., Merlo, K., Lawrence, R. C., Slutsky, J., & Gray, C. E. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12300 · Cited by 370
Casper, W. J., Vaziri, H., Wayne, J. H., DeHauw, S., & Greenhaus, J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000259 · Cited by 348
How Work–Family Research Can Finally Have an Impact in Organizations
Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x · Cited by 339
Self-citationWayne, J. H., Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Allen, T. D. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12132 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365-375
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2051373600
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365
- The paper
- Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E. (2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
