Cited by 174Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.

Open access
Hertzog, Christopher, Lindenberger, Ulman, Ghisletta, Paolo, von Oertzen, Timo·2006·Psychological Methods

Abstract

We evaluated the statistical power of single-indicator latent growth curve models (LGCMs) to detect correlated change between two variables (covariance of slopes) as a function of sample size, number of longitudinal measurement occasions, and reliability (measurement error variance). Power approximations following the method of Satorra and Saris (1985) were used to evaluate the power to detect slope covariances. Even with large samples (N = 500) and several longitudinal occasions (4 or 5), statistical power to detect covariance of slopes was moderate to low unless growth curve reliability at study onset was above .90. Studies using LGCMs may fail to detect slope correlations because of low power rather than a lack of relationship of change between variables. The present findings allow researchers to make more informed design decisions when planning a longitudinal study and aid in interpreting LGCM results regarding correlated interindividual differences in rates of development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.11.3.244

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hertzog et al. showed that power to detect individual differences in change is dramatically affected by growth-curve reliability, which is influenced by measurement reliability.

    “Hertzog et al. (2006) showed that power to detect individual differences in change is dramatically affected by growth-curve reliability, which in turn is influenced by measurement reliability.”

    From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Hertzog, Lindenberger, Ghisletta, & von Oertzen, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hertzog, C., Lindenberger, U., Ghisletta, P., & von Oertzen, T.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
2006
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
244-252
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2170742243
Cited by
174
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
latent growth curve models, statistical power, measurement reliability, measurement error, sample size, longitudinal study design
MeSH terms
Aging, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychology, Multivariate Analysis, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review