On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the statistical power of single-indicator latent growth curve models (LGCMs) to detect correlated change between two variables (covariance of slopes) as a function of sample size, number of longitudinal measurement occasions, and reliability (measurement error variance). Power approximations following the method of Satorra and Saris (1985) were used to evaluate the power to detect slope covariances. Even with large samples (N = 500) and several longitudinal occasions (4 or 5), statistical power to detect covariance of slopes was moderate to low unless growth curve reliability at study onset was above .90. Studies using LGCMs may fail to detect slope correlations because of low power rather than a lack of relationship of change between variables. The present findings allow researchers to make more informed design decisions when planning a longitudinal study and aid in interpreting LGCM results regarding correlated interindividual differences in rates of development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hertzog et al. showed that power to detect individual differences in change is dramatically affected by growth-curve reliability, which is influenced by measurement reliability.
“Hertzog et al. (2006) showed that power to detect individual differences in change is dramatically affected by growth-curve reliability, which in turn is influenced by measurement reliability.”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Hertzog, Lindenberger, Ghisletta, & von Oertzen, 2006
Cites
Sample size in factor analysis.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84 · Cited by 5,497 · see citing works
The earth is round (p < .05).
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003 · see citing works
How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0904_8 · Cited by 2,362 · see citing works
Lifespan CognitionMechanisms of Change
Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.001.0001 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Latent Variable Modeling of Differences and Changes with Longitudinal Data
McArdle, J. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612 · Cited by 1,952 · see citing works
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Self-citationEducation and cognitive functioning across the life span
Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100620920576 · Cited by 1,224 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications
Kievit, R. A., Brandmaier, A. M., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., de Mooij, S. M. M., Moutoussis, M., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., et al. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.007 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Self-citationLongitudinal Modeling of Developmental Changes in Psychological Research
Ferrer, E., & McArdle, J. J. (2010) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721410370300 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Analyzing multiple outcomes in clinical research using multivariate multilevel models.
Baldwin, S. A., Imel, Z. E., Braithwaite, S. R., & Atkins, D. C. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035628 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Developmental changes and gender differences in adolescents' perceptions of friendships
De Goede, I. H. A., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2009) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.002 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Predictors of ageing-related decline across multiple cognitive functions
Ritchie, S. J., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Cox, S. R., Corley, J., Dykiert, D., Redmond, P., Pattie, A., Taylor, A. M., Sibbett, R., Starr, J. M., et al. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.08.007 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
On Measuring and Modeling Physiological Synchrony in Dyads
Helm, J. L., Miller, J. G., Kahle, S., Troxel, N. R., & Hastings, P. D. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1459292 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Kleemeyer, M. M., Kühn, S., Prindle, J., Bodammer, N. C., Brechtel, L., Garthe, A., Kempermann, G., Schaefer, S., & Lindenberger, U. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.026 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationPagé, M. G., Katz, J., Romero Escobar, E. M., Lutzky-Cohen, N., Curtis, K., Fuss, S., & Clarke, H. A. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460327.10515.2d · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Brown, C. L., Gibbons, L. E., Kennison, R. F., Robitaille, A., Lindwall, M., Mitchell, M. B., Shirk, S. D., Atri, A., Cimino, C. R., Benitez, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.1155/2012/287438 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Accuracy of estimates and statistical power for testing meditation in latent growth curve modeling
Cheong, J. (2011) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557334 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Treatment improves symptoms shared by PTSD and disordered eating
Mitchell, K. S., Wells, S. Y., Mendes, A., & Resick, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.21737 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
A dual-process model for cognitive training
Ericson, J., & Klingberg, T. (2023) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-023-00161-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hertzog, C., Lindenberger, U., Ghisletta, P., & von Oertzen, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 244-252
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2170742243
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Georgia Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- latent growth curve models, statistical power, measurement reliability, measurement error, sample size, longitudinal study design
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychology, Multivariate Analysis, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review