Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues.

Abstract

Many meta-analysts incorrectly use correlations or standardized mean difference statistics to compute effect sizes on dichotomous data. Odds ratios and their logarithms should almost always be preferred for such data. This article reviews the issues and shows how to use odds ratios in meta-analytic data, both alone and in combination with other effect size estimators. Examples illustrate procedures for estimating the weighted average of such effect sizes and methods for computing variance estimates, confidence intervals, and homogeneity tests. Descriptions of fixedand random-effects models help determine whether effect sizes are functions of study characteristics, and a random-effects regression model, previously unused for odds ratio data, is described. Although all but the latter of these procedures are already widely known in areas such as medicine and epidemiology, the absence of their use in psychology suggests a need for this description.

Cites (3)

1. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
   Fleiss, Joseph L., Levin, Bruce, Paik, Myunghee Cho · 2003 · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
2. Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance
   Jacobson, Neil S., Follette, William C., Revenstorf, Dirk · 1984 · Behavior Therapy
3. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study
   Smith, Teresa C., Spiegelhalter, David J., Thomas, Andrew · 1995 · Statistics in Medicine

Show all 3 references

Cited by (31)

1. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
   Ferguson, Christopher J. · 2009 · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
2. Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review
   Archer, John · 2004 · Review of General Psychology
3. Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
   Hart, William, Albarracín, Dolores, Eagly, Alice H., Brechan, Inge, Lindberg, Matthew J., Merrill, Lisa · 2009 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories
   Tannenbaum, Melanie B., Hepler, Justin, Zimmerman, Rick S., Saul, Lindsey, Jacobs, Samantha, Wilson, Kristina, Albarracín, Dolores · 2015 · Psychological Bulletin
5. The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: a meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment
   Landenberger, Nana A., Lipsey, Mark W. · 2005 · Journal of Experimental Criminology

See all 338