The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample size in factor analysis.
Abstract
The factor analysis literature includes a range of recommendations regarding the minimum sample size necessary to obtain factor solutions that are adequately stable and that correspond closely to population factors. A fundamental misconception about this issue is that the minimum sample size, or the minimum ratio of sample size to the number of variables, is invariant across studies. In fact, necessary sample size is dependent on several aspects of any given study, including the level of communality of the variables and the level of overdetermination of the factors. The authors present a theoretical and mathematical framework that provides a basis for understanding and predicting these effects. The hypothesized effects are verified by a sampling study using artificial data. Results demonstrate the lack of validity of common rules of thumb and provide a basis for establishing guidelines for sample size in factor analysis. In the factor analysis literature, much attention has be;;n given to the issue of sample size. It is widely understood that the use of larger samples in applica-tions of factor analysis tends to provide results such that sample factor loadings are more precise estimates of population loadings and are also more stable, or les s variable, across repeated sampling. Despite gen-eral agreement on this matter, there is considerable di'/ergence of opinion and evidence about the ques-tion of how large a sample is necessary to adequately acnieve these objectives. Recommendations and find-ings about this issue are diverse and often contradic-tory. The objectives of this article are to provide a
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“recent simulations show that the sample size required to recover a stable factor structure is a joint function of number of factors, number of items per factor (with the required sample size stabilizing after 6–10 items per factor), and strength of factor loadings (MacCallum et al., 1999; Mundfrom et al., 2005).”
From The structure of adult ADHD. (2017) · cites this paper as MacCallum et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Additionally, SEM flexibility allowing the examination of complex associations, multiple data types, model and/or group comparisons thus, developing general rules regarding sample size requirements are impractical (MacCallum et al., 1999; Wolf et al., 2013).”
From Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General (2018) · cites this paper as MacCallum et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“While this sample size may not be considered very large, it is much in line with sample sizes in other strategy studies (Phelan, Ferreira, and Salvador, 2002) and exceeds common recommendations for advanced statistical analyses (e.g., MacCallum et al., 1999).”
From On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism (2014) · cites this paper as MacCallum et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“According to this rule, data collection process was initiated with the aim of reaching at least 150 patients, which is five times of 30 questions.”
From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as MacCallum et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“We therefore followed the recommendations of MacCallum et al. (1999) and Schönbrodt and Perugini (2013) and aimed to collect data from ~300 participants using each technology.”
From Technology evaluations are associated with psychological need satisfaction across different spheres of experience: an application of the METUX scales (2023) · cites this paper as MacCallum et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Following the recommendations of MacCallum et al. (1999) regarding sample size for factor analyses, we aimed to collect data from 300 participants (150 participants who use Facebook and 150 participants who use virtual learning platforms).”
From Technology evaluations are associated with psychological need satisfaction across different spheres of experience: an application of the METUX scales (2023) · cites this paper as MacCallum et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“The minimum sample size was estimated to be 360 participants following the established guidelines for survey validation studies, considering 36 items with 10 participants per item [42-44].”
From Assessing Health Students' Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
Self-citationMultivariate Statistical Methods
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2263 · Cited by 5,584
Harman, H. H. (1960) · Cited by 5,148
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315827506 · Cited by 4,546
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Price, B., Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1993) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1993.10485363 · Cited by 3,512
Merrifield, P. R., & Harman, H. H. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161864 · Cited by 2,574
Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method.
Browne, M. W., Lawley, D., & Maxwell, A. E. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2986693 · Cited by 2,067
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1984) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294170 · Cited by 1,775
Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF)
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,618
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,019
The Regulatory Fit of Serial Entrepreneurship Intentions
Simmons, S. A., Carr, J. C., Hsu, D. K., & Shu, C. (2016) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12070 · Cited by 46
Khazaee-Pool, M., Majlessi, F., Montazeri, A., Pashaei, T., Gholami, A., & Ponnet, K. S. (2016) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-016-0318-2 · Cited by 46
Villar, Ó. A. E. D., Alvarado, P. M., Gutiérrez-Vega, M., Saucedo, I. C. C., Peña, G. M. G., Romero, N. A. R., García-Sánchez, M. D., & Alcaraz, S. G. O. (2017) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4150-x · Cited by 46
Challenging Conventional Wisdom for Multivariate Statistical Models With Small Samples
McNeish, D. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317727727 · Cited by 54
Butera, K. A., George, S. Z., & Lentz, T. A. (2019) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2019.09.003 · Cited by 45
Endres, H., Helm, R., & Dowling, M. J. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.004 · Cited by 51
Development of the Brief Inventory of Perceived Stress
Lehman, K. A., Burns, M. N., Gagen, E. C., & Mohr, D. C. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21843 · Cited by 46
Measuring childhood materialism: Refining and validating Schor's Consumer Involvement Scale
Bottomley, P. A., Nairn, A. C., Kasser, T., Ferguson, Y. L., & Ormrod, J. (2010) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20353 · Cited by 46
Hodge, D. R. (2007) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731506296168 · Cited by 46
Consumer motivation for the decision to boycott: The social dilemma
Shin, S., & Yoon, S. (2018) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12444 · Cited by 48
Psychometric Properties of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory: A Review
Saari, T. T., Koivisto, A. M., Hintsa, T., Hänninen, T., & Hallikainen, I. T. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-200739 · Cited by 50
A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification
Bixter, M. T., McMichael, S. L., Bunker, C. J., Adelman, R. M., Okun, M. A., Grimm, K. J., Graudejus, O., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242504 · Cited by 49
A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis
Urban, C. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2021) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09748-3 · Cited by 52
Interpersonal influences on patients’ surgical decision making: the role of close others
Rini, C. K., Jandorf, L. H., Goldsmith, R. E., Manne, S. L., Harpaz, N., & Itzkowitz, S. H. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-011-9323-y · Cited by 45
Şimşek, G. G., & Noyan, F. (2013) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2012.689062 · Cited by 50
Hoyt, T., & Yeater, E. A. (2010) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/a0018745 · Cited by 49
The development and validation of the daily electronic Endometriosis Pain and Bleeding Diary
Deal, L. S., DiBenedetti, D. B., Williams, V. S. L., & Fehnel, S. E. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-64 · Cited by 45
Khodadady, E., & Ghahari, S. (2011) · Global Journal of Human-Social Science · Cited by 45
Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2011) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.07.002 · Cited by 45
Profiles of self-care management versus consulting behaviors in adults with heart failure
Lee, C. S., Gelow, J. M., Mudd, J. O., Green, J. K., Hiatt, S. O., Chien, C., & Riegel, B. J. (2013) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1177/1474515113519188 · Cited by 45
Willingness-to-pay price premiums for certified fruits —A case of fresh apples in China
Wang, L., & Huo, X. (2016) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.01.005 · Cited by 45
Psychometric properties of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale: A Singaporean perspective
Chew, J., & Haase, A. M. (2016) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.015 · Cited by 45
Gold, B., Hellermann, C., & Holodynski, M. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-017-0727-5 · Cited by 49
Smith, E., Knoerl, R., Yang, J. J., Kanzawa-Lee, G. A., Lee, D., & Bridges, C. M. (2018) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/1073274818756608 · Cited by 45
Giuffrida, M. A., Brown, D. C., Ellenberg, S. S., & Farrar, J. T. (2018) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.252.9.1073 · Cited by 46
Analysis of employee and management fraud in Tanzania
Zuberi, O., & Mzenzi, S. I. (2019) · Journal of Financial Crime · doi:10.1108/jfc-01-2018-0012 · Cited by 45
Budzanowska-Drzewiecka, M., & Tutko, M. (2021) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-11-2020-0268 · Cited by 55
Tuấn, L. T. (2021) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104399 · Cited by 52
“Last, the small sample size (N = 63) did not suffice for EFA (MacCallum et al., 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialBergmann, T. J., Sappok, T., Diefenbacher, A., Dames, S., Heinrich, M., Ziegler, M. D., & Dziobek, I. (2015) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.05.011 · Cited by 47
Structure and prevalence of PTSD symptomology in children who have experienced a severe tornado
Evans, L. G., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. J. (2006) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20150 · Cited by 46
Marx‐Fleck, S., Junker, N. M., Artinger, F. M., & van Dick, R. (2021) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12353 · Cited by 55
“We used the following criteria to analyse the item set: First, item commonalities should exceed .60, as recommended by MacCallum et al. (1999).”
MethodPsychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains
Većkalov, B., Zarzeczna, N., McPhetres, J., van Harreveld, F., & Rutjens, B. T. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221118184 · Cited by 44
“We examined the five-factor solution first but found that the fifth factor contained only two items with high loadings ( > .40), which signals a poorly specified factor (MacCallum et al., 1999).”
Moral distress, moral courage, and career identity among nurses: A cross-sectional study
Peng, M., Saito, S., Guan, H., & Ma, X.-H. (2022) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330221140512 · Cited by 46
“MacCallum et al.30 recommended that the minimum necessary sample size should be at least 100, or the sample size to variable number ratio should be at least 5.”
BackgroundHost population perceptions of the social impacts of sport tourism events in transition countries
Pranić, L., Petrić, L., & Cetinić, L. (2012) · International Journal of Event and Festival Management · doi:10.1108/17582951211262684 · Cited by 44
Development of a Brief Measure of Postpartum Distress
Allison, K. C., Wenzel, A. E., Kleiman, K., & Sarwer, D. B. (2011) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.1989 · Cited by 44
Rotation to a partially specified target matrix in exploratory factor analysis in practice
Myers, N. D., Jin, Y., Ahn, S., Çelimli, Ş., & Zopluoglu, C. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0486-7 · Cited by 44
Coping among military veterans with PTSD in substance use disorder treatment
Boden, M. T., Kimerling, R. E., Kulkarni, M. R., Bonn‐Miller, M. O., Weaver, C. M., & Trafton, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2014.03.006 · Cited by 49
Kwon, Y., & Kwak, D. H. (2014) · Sport Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106169341402300206 · Cited by 44
Yun, S. H. (2010) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260510365857 · Cited by 44
Development and Initial Validation of the Sexual Minority Women Rejection Sensitivity Scale
Dyar, C., Feinstein, B. A., Eaton, N. R., & London, B. E. (2015) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684315608843 · Cited by 50
A Psychometric Review of Instruments for Social Justice and Advocacy Attitudes
Fietzer, A. W., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2015) · Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology · doi:10.33043/jsacp.7.1.19-40 · Cited by 45
Chadwick, S. B., Burke, S., Goldey, K. L., Bell, S. N., & van Anders, S. M. (2017) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0895-z · Cited by 6
Ronen, S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.006 · Cited by 52
Henle, C. A., Dineen, B. R., & Duffy, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9527-4 · Cited by 44
Long, K. Q., Tuong, V. T., Huynh, V.-A. N., & Thai, T. T. (2018) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/s13011-018-0147-4 · Cited by 44
Back to the roots: The 2 × 2 standpoints and standards achievement goal model
Korn, R., Elliot, A. J., & Daumiller, M. H. (2019) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.009 · Cited by 46
A Preliminary Embodiment Short Questionnaire
Eubanks, J. C., Moore, A. G., Fishwick, P. A., & McMahan, R. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.647896 · Cited by 51
“These target numbers also exceeded the recommendation of having at least a 5:1 ratio of measurements to items factored (MacCallum et al., 1999; Kline, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodGroundwater Quality in the Yucatan Peninsula: Insights from Stable Isotope and Metals Analysis
Arcega‐Cabrera, F., Sickman, J. O., Fargher, L. F., Herrera-Silveira, J. A., Lucero, D. M., Oceguera‐Vargas, I., Lamas‐Cosío, E., & Ardila, P. A. R. (2021) · Ground Water · doi:10.1111/gwat.13109 · Cited by 42
“A cut off value of 0.6 for significant loadings was used for sample sizes less than 100, following MacCallum et al. (1999).”
MethodInfluentialSkala Suizidales Erleben und Verhalten (SSEV)
Teismann, T., Forkmann, T., Glaesmer, H., Juckel, G., & Cwik, J. C. (2021) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000269 · Cited by 48
Jones, T., & Nguyen, M. (2021) · Quaestiones Geographicae · doi:10.2478/quageo-2021-0013 · Cited by 43
Bernstein, A., & Brantz, H. (2012) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9471-6 · Cited by 47
It's All in the Game: A 3D Learning Model for Business Ethics
Jagger, S., Siala, H., & Sloan, D. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2557-9 · Cited by 42
Clark, M. C., & Diamond, P. M. (2009) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20358 · Cited by 43
Ke, D., Chen, A., & Su, C. (2016) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-016-9217-8 · Cited by 43
der Linden, N. V., Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Frenay, M., Azzi, A. E., Klein, O., & Galand, B. (2018) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.008 · Cited by 47
Moradi, M., Parker, M. A., Sneddon, A., López, V., & Ellwood, D. A. (2019) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-019-0762-x · Cited by 53
Perception of food manufacturers towards adoption of halal food supply chain in Malaysia
Azmi, F. R., Abdullah, A., Musa, H., & Mahmood, W. H. W. (2019) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-12-2018-0236 · Cited by 64
Reichert, F., Zhang, J., Law, N. W. Y., Wong, G. K. W., & TORRE, J. D. L. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09825-x · Cited by 54
“3) had quite low commonalities (i.e. below .50, which means that the four dimensions together accounted for less than half of the variance in these two items; MacCallum et al. 1999), despite their acceptable loadings.”
BackgroundXu, X., Xia, M., & Pang, W. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12750 · Cited by 49
A Comparison of Factor Rotation Methods for Dichotomous Data
Finch, W. H. (2011) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1320120780 · Cited by 43
Individuals exhibit idiosyncratic eye-movement behavior profiles across tasks
Poynter, W. D., Barber, M., Inman, J., & Wiggins, C. (2013) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.002 · Cited by 43
Carleton, R. N., Asmundson, G. J. G., & Taylor, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-005-2403-y · Cited by 43
Hungerford, G. M., Garcia, D., & Bagner, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9478-x · Cited by 43
Stein, M. B., Slavin‐Mulford, J. M., Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., & Blais, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.668594 · Cited by 43
Factor Loading Estimation Error and Stability Using Exploratory Factor Analysis
Sass, D. A. (2009) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164409355695 · Cited by 43
Software Requirements: Update, upgrade, redesign. towards a theory of requirements change
Hoorn, J. F. (2001) · Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · Cited by 43
The use of ChatGPT for personality research: Administering questionnaires using generated personas
de Winter, J., Driessen, T., & Dodou, D. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112729 · Cited by 54
Silkens, M., Smirnova, A., Stalmeijer, R. E., Arah, O. A., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H. (2015) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2015.1060300 · Cited by 41
The Roles of Group Membership, Beliefs, and Norms in Ecological Risk Perception
Willis, H. H., & DeKay, M. L. (2007) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00958.x · Cited by 42
The Effects of Nations and Organisations on Work Value Importance: A Cross‐Cultural Investigation
Hattrup, K., Mueller, K., & Jöns, I. (2007) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00268.x · Cited by 42
Wolf, E. J., Mitchell, K. S., Koenen, K. C., & Miller, M. W. (2013) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713002286 · Cited by 43
A psychometric examination of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale among college men.
Davidson, M. M., Gervais, S. J., Canivez, G. L., & Cole, B. P. (2013) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032075 · Cited by 42
Development, Validity and Reliability of TPACK Scale with Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers
Önal, N. (2016) · International Online Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.15345/iojes.2016.02.009 · Cited by 42
Lenferink, A., Effing, T., Harvey, P. W., Battersby, M., Frith, P. A., van Beurden, W., van der Palen, J. A. M., & Paap, M. C. S. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161595 · Cited by 42
Pädagogisch-psychologisches Professionswissen von Lehrkräften: Evaluation des ProwiN-Tests
Lenske, G., Thillmann, H., Wirth, J., Dicke, T., & Leutner, D. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-015-0627-5 · Cited by 41
Cotter, A., Proctor, K. B., & Brestan‐Knight, E. (2018) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.044 · Cited by 43
Surveying nursing students on their sources of stress: A validation study
Gibbons, C., Dempster, M., & Moutray, M. (2009) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.04.008 · Cited by 42
Shen, J., Cooley, V. E., Ma, X., Reeves, P. L., Burt, W. L., Rainey, J. M., & Yuan, W. (2011) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.550338 · Cited by 42
Editorial Commentary: Addressing Confusion in the Diffusion of Archival Data Research
Miller, J. W., Davis‐Sramek, B., Fugate, B. S., Pagell, M. D., & Flynn, B. B. (2020) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12236 · Cited by 42
Measuring Students' Curiosity Character Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Herwin, H., & Nurhayati, R. (2021) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.773 · Cited by 41
“The use of participants who are more than 100 or five times the number of items analyzed can be done as an effort to obtain valid data in factor analysis (MacCallum et al., 1999; O’Rourke & Hatcher, 2013).”
Development and validation of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale for Teachers (AILST)
Ning, Y., Zhang, W., Yao, D., Fang, B., Xu, B., & Wijaya, T. T. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13347-5 · Cited by 71
“According to common statistical guidelines, the sample size should be at least five times the number of items (MacCallum et al., 1999).”
Schaefer, S. A., & Steklis, H. D. (2014) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22275 · Cited by 41
Fit Indices and Model Modification in Structural Equation Modeling : A Review and new findings
Hoshino, T., Okada, K., & Maeda, T. (2005) · Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics) · doi:10.2333/jbhmk.32.209 · Cited by 41
Lynch, J., Moore, M. V., Moss-Morris, R. E., & Kendrick, T. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.019 · Cited by 41
Gómez‐Campelo, P., Bragado‐Álvarez, C., Hernández-Lloreda, M. J., & Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L. (2014) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2383-0 · Cited by 41
Brasileiro, S. V., Orsini, M. R. D. C. A., Cavalcante, J. A., Bartholomeu, D., Montiel, J. M., Costa, P. S., & Costa, L. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152233 · Cited by 41
Huang, B. H., Chang, Y.-H. S., Niu, L., & Zhi, M. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.07.004 · Cited by 48
Zhang, B., Ritchie, B. W., Mair, J., & Driml, S. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1629448 · Cited by 43
Psychometrics in Behavioral Software Engineering: A Methodological Introduction with Guidelines
Graziotin, D., Lenberg, P., FELDT, R. H., & Wagner, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3469888 · Cited by 59
“[68] analyzed how different sample sizes and communalities of the variables were able to reproduce the population factor loadings.”
BackgroundMoser, C., Fuchsberger, V., Neureiter, K., Sellner, W., & Tscheligi, M. (2012) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2212776.2212822 · Cited by 42
Validation of inpatient experience questionnaire
Wong, E. L., Coulter, A., Cheung, A. W. L., Yam, C. H. K., Yeoh, E., & Griffiths, S. M. (2013) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzt034 · Cited by 41
Chan, D. W. (2003) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/001698620304700202 · Cited by 41
Bridging the Idiographic‐Nomothetic Divide: A Follow‐Up Study
Grice, J. W., Jackson, B. J., & Mcdaniel, B. L. (2006) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00407.x · Cited by 41
Hayas, C. L., Quintana, J. M., Padierna, J. Á., Bilbao, A., & Muñoz, P. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-29 · Cited by 41
Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., Ward, T. J., Ward, S. B., Canivez, G. L., & Worrell, F. C. (2001) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2001.12086101 · Cited by 41
Brown, R. J., Burton, A. L., & Abbott, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23370 · Cited by 39
Measuring Decentering and Related Constructs: Capacity and Limitations of Extant Assessment Scales
Hadash, Y., Lichtash, Y., & Bernstein, A. (2017) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0743-9 · Cited by 40
Skerman, H. M., Yates, P. M., & Battistutta, D. (2012) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.07.009 · Cited by 40
Testing a structural model of young driver willingness to uptake Smartphone Driver Support Systems
Kervick, A. A., Hogan, M., O’Hora, D. P., & Sarma, K. M. (2015) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.023 · Cited by 40
The Prowess and Pitfalls of Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling
Stromeyer, W. R., Miller, J. W., Sriramachandramurthy, R., & DeMartino, R. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314551962 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-99
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2122376319
- Cited by
- 5,497
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 456 · 2025: 418 · 2024: 359 · 2023: 311 · 2022: 359 · 2021: 396 · 2020: 413 · 2019: 318 · 2018: 286 · 2017: 276 · 2016: 259 · 2015: 226 · 2014: 230 · 2013: 233 · 2012: 177
- FWCI
- 27.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- sample size, factor analysis, minimum sample size, communality, rules of thumb
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review