The DOI matches its Crossref record; 267 of the 268 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meaning in the Context of Stress and Coping
Abstract
Although theoretical and empirical work on topics related to meaning and meaning making proliferate, careful evaluation and integration of this area have not been carried out. Toward this end, this article has 3 goals: (a) to elaborate the critical dimensions of meaning as it relates to stressful life events and conditions, (b) to extend the transactional model of stress and coping to include these dimensions, and (c) to provide a framework for understanding current research and directions for future research within this extended model. First, the authors present a framework for understanding diverse conceptual and operational definitions of meaning by distinguishing 2 levels of meaning, termed global meaning and situationalmeaning. Second, the authors use this framework to review and synthesize the literature on the functions of meaning in the coping process and propose a definition of meaningmaking that highlights the critical role of reappraisal. The authors specify the roles of attributions throughout the coping process and discuss implications for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals with chronic meaning deficits are particularly vulnerable to experiencing stress in challenging circumstances (Park & Folkman, 1997).”
From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Park & Folkman, 1997
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Self-citationA Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,654
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1037/0022-006X.55.1.29 · DOI
- Affleck G., 1985, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 653
- Andreason N. J. C., 1977, Coping with physicalillness, 149
- Batson C. D., 1993, Religion and the individual: A social-psychological approach
- Bowlby J., 1969, Attachment
- Breznitz S., 1983, Denial of stress
- Brown J. D., 1993, Cognitive coping, families and disability, 123
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.184 · DOI
- Epstein S., 1980, Personality: Basic issues and current research, 89
- Fiske S. T., 1991, Social cognition
- 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992 · DOI
- Folkman S., Coping with chronicstress
- Furlong R. C. S., 1982, Personalmeanings, 141
- Gilovich T., 1995, Psychological Bulletin, 102, 379
- Horowitz M. J., 1982, Handbook of stress, 711
- Janoff-Bulman R., 1991, Perspectives in personality: A research annual, 99
- Lerner M. J., 1970, Altruism and helping behaviors, 205
- Maes S., 1996, Handbook ofcoping: Theory, research, and application, 221
- Martin L. L., 1989, Unintended thought, 306
- Martin L. L., 1993, Handbookof mental control, 552
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.919 · DOI
- McCubbin H. I., 1993, Cognitive coping, families and disability, 239
- McIntoshD. N. (1991, August). Religion as schema: Implications for the relation between religion and coping. In HillP. C., Promising cognitive models foran empirical psychology of religion Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Monroe S. M., 1995, Measuring stress: A guide for health and socialscientists
- Montada L., 1992, Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood, 133
- Moos R. H., 1993, Handbook of stress, 234
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.579 · DOI
- Pargament K. I., God help me: The psychology of religion and coping
- Patterson J. M., 1993, Cognitive coping, families and disability, 221
- 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.528 · DOI
- Reker G. T., 1988, Emergingtheories of aging, 214
- 10.1037/0022-006X.57.3.344 · DOI
- Shrimali S., 1987, Clinical Studies, 3, 135
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.916 · DOI
- Stein N. L., 1993, Handbook ofemotions, 279
- Tait R., 1989, Unintended thought, 351
- Taylor S. E., 1981, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium, 1, 89
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.489 · DOI
- Tennen H., Post-traumatic growth: Theory and research on processes of change in the aftermath of crises
- 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.540 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.293 · DOI
- Tunis S. L., 1991, Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns, 261
- 10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.132 · DOI
- Wills T. A., 1992, Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood, 196
- Wortman C. B., 1992, Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood, 341
- Wurf E., 1991, Perspectives in personality: A research annual, 39
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80 · Cited by 4,843
Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320 · Cited by 3,947
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456 · Cited by 3,485
Self-citationPark, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174
Self-citationCarver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352 · Cited by 2,424
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. L., & Folkman, S.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Crystal L.
- ORCID
- Park, Crystal L.
- Venue
- Review of General Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-144
- ISSN
- 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1552
- OpenAlex
- W2069826700
- Cited by
- 1,821
- References
- 268
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- meaning in life, meaning-making, stress coping, transactional model of stress and coping, life events, global meaning, situational meaning, cognitive reappraisal, attribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review