The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team Goal Commitment and Team Effectiveness: The Role of Task Interdependence and Supportive Behaviors.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to test the relationships between team goal commitment and 3 criteria of team effectiveness (i.e., team performance, quality of group experience, and team viability) as well as to examine the moderating effect of task interdependence and the mediating role of supportive behaviors. Data were gathered from a sample of 74 teams working in 13 Canadian organizations. Results indicated that team goal commitment is positively related to all 3 criteria of team effectiveness. In addition, task interdependence moderates the relationship between team goal commitment and team performance. Furthermore, supportive behaviors mediate the relationships that team goal commitment has with team performance and the quality of group experience. Implications of these findings and future research needs are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 1×
“The core findings of these studies are that specific and difficult goals lead to higher levels of performance than do easy goals or no goals (Locke & Latham, 2002).”
BackgroundEstimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents of Commitment to Difficult Goals
Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.18 · Cited by 563
Cited by
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013079 · Cited by 2,356
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.1142 · Cited by 284
The assessment of commitment: Advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach.
Klein, H. J., Cooper, J. T., Molloy, J. C., & Swanson, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034751 · Cited by 269
What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness.
Driskell, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & O'Shea, P. G. (2006) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249 · Cited by 260
Do, H. J., Kong, H.-K., Tetali, P., Lee, J., & Bailey, B. P. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579532 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V.
- Venue
- Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 189-204
- ISSN
- 1089-2699 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7802
- OpenAlex
- W2016476221
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team Goal Commitment and Team Effectiveness: The Role of Task Interdependence and Supportive Behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189
- The paper
- Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team Goal Commitment and Team Effectiveness: The Role of Task Interdependence and Supportive Behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
