Cited by 260Team Dynamics and PerformancePersonality Traits and PsychologyEmotional Intelligence and Performance

What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness.

Open access
Driskell, James E., Goodwin, Gerald F., Salas, Eduardo, O'Shea, Patrick Gavan·2006·Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice

Abstract

Good team players are often defined in trait terms; that is, they are described as dependable, flexible, or cooperative. Our goal is to examine the relationship between team member personality traits and team effectiveness. However, to understand the effects of personality on team performance requires greater specificity in how personality is described and in how team effectiveness is described. A hierarchical model of team member personality is presented that defines higher-level personality traits and specific facets relevant to team performance. Next, a classification of the core teamwork dimensions underlying effective team performance is presented. Finally, predictions are derived linking team member personality facets to specific teamwork requirements. © 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Openness to experience is linked to behavioral flexibility because openness is associated with receptivity to change, trying out new things, and being adaptable to changing situations.

    “Similarly, openness to experience is linked to behavioral flexibility (Blickle, 1996;Driskell, Goodwin, Salas, & O'Shea, 2006), because openness is associated with receptivity to change, trying out new things, and being adaptable to changing situations (LePine, Colquitt, & Erez, 2000).”

    From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Driskell, Goodwin, Salas, & O'Shea, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driskell, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & O'Shea, P. G.
Venue
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice
Published
2006-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
249-271
ISSN
  • 1089-2699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7802
OpenAlex
W2165353878
Cited by
260
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Keywords
personality traits, team effectiveness, teamwork, personality facets, team performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review