The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative methods in psychology.
Abstract
Presence of excess zeros and the distributions are major concern in modeling count data.Zero inflated and hurdle models are regression techniques which can handle zero inflated count data.This study compares various count regression models for survey data observed with excess zeros.The data for the study is obtained from a survey conducted to assess the harms attributable to drinkers among children.Poisson, negative binomial and their zero inflated and hurdle versions were compared by fitting them to two count response variables, number of physical and number of psychological harms.The models were compared using fit indices, residual analysis and predicted values.The robustness of the models were also compared using simulated data sets.Results indicated that the Poisson regression was less robust to deviations from the distributional assumptions.The negative binomial regression and hurdle regression model were found to be suitable to model the number of physical and number of psychological harms respectively.The results showed that excess zeros in count data does not imply zero inflation.The zero inflated or hurdle models are suitable for zero inflated data.The selection between the zero inflated and hurdle models should be based on the assumed cause of zeros.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing
Lambert, D. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269547 · Cited by 3,988
The analysis of count data: a gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives.
Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802634175 · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
The serial position effect of free recall.
Murdock, B. B. (1962) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045106 · Cited by 1,717
Yin, J. C. P., Del Vecchio, M., Zhou, H., & Tully, T. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90375-5 · Cited by 642
Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001 · Cited by 491
Receiving instrumental support at work: When help is not welcome.
Deelstra, J. T., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., Stroebe, W., Zijlstra, F. R. H., & van Doornen, L. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.324 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, D.
- Venue
- McGraw-Hill Book Company
- Publisher
- McGraw-Hill Book Company
- Published
- 1960
- OpenAlex
- W1964788795
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative methods in psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/11626-000
- The paper
- Lewis, D. (1960). Quantitative methods in psychology. McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11626-000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.