Cited by 1,172Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

The analysis of count data: a gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives.

Coxe, Stefany, West, Stephen G., Aiken, Leona S.·2009·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

Count data reflect the number of occurrences of a behavior in a fixed period of time (e.g., number of aggressive acts by children during a playground period). In cases in which the outcome variable is a count with a low arithmetic mean (typically < 10), standard ordinary least squares regression may produce biased results. We provide an introduction to regression models that provide appropriate analyses for count data. We introduce standard Poisson regression with an example and discuss its interpretation. Two variants of Poisson regression, overdispersed Poisson regression and negative binomial regression, are introduced that may provide more optimal results when a key assumption of standard Poisson regression is violated. We also discuss the problems of excess zeros in which a subgroup of respondents who would never display the behavior are included in the sample and truncated zeros in which respondents who have a zero count are excluded by the sampling plan. We provide computer syntax for our illustrations in SAS and SPSS. The Poisson family of regression models provides improved and now easy to implement analyses of count data. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Journal of Personality Assessment for the following free supplemental resources: the data set used to illustrate Poisson regression in this article, which is available in three formats-a text file, an SPSS database, or a SAS database.].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223890802634175

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2009-02-10
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
121-136
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2133992176
Cited by
1,172
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 42
FWCI
22.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
count data, Poisson regression, negative binomial regression, excess zeros, zero-inflated count data, SPSS syntax
MeSH terms
Aggression, Child, Child Behavior, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Psychometrics, Regression Analysis, Models, Statistical, Poisson Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review