The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The biological basis of personality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm
Eysenck, H. J. (1991) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90144-z · Cited by 848
Five (or three) Robust Questionnaire Scale Factors of Personality without Culture
Zuckerman, M., Michael Kuhlman, D., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90182-b · Cited by 344
Individual differences in human circadian rhythms
Horne, J. A., & Östberg, O. (1977) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(77)90001-1 · Cited by 314
Neuroticism from the Top Down: Psychophysiology and Negative Emotionality
Matthews, G. (2004) · On the Psychobiology of Personality · doi:10.1016/b978-008044209-9/50015-4 · Cited by 93
Sensation-seeking and emotional disturbances in depression: relationships and evolution
Carton, S., Morand, P., Bungenera, C., & Jouvent, R. (1995) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/0165-0327(95)00020-n · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Thorpe, L. P., & Schmuller, A. M.
- Venue
- Personality: An interdisciplinary approach.
- Publisher
- D Van Nostrand Company
- Published
- 1958
- Pages
- 15-40
- OpenAlex
- W2498108407
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The biological basis of personality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/12225-002
- The paper
- Thorpe, L. P., & Schmuller, A. M. (1958). The biological basis of personality. Personality: An interdisciplinary approach. https://doi.org/10.1037/12225-002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
