Cited by 141Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsEducational Research and Methods

Perspectives on the epistemological bases for qualitative research.

Willig, Carla·2012·APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/13619-002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willig, C.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Willig, Carla
Venue
APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics.
Published
2012
Pages
5-21
OpenAlex
W2476652064
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
27.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
qualitative research, epistemology, epistemological foundations, research philosophy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review