Cited by 140Spatial Cognition and NavigationGeography Education and PedagogyPlace Attachment and Urban Studies

Handbook of spatial cognition.

·2013·American Psychological Association eBooks

Abstract

Spatial cognition is a branch of cognitive psychology that studies how people acquire and use knowledge about their environment to determine where they are, how to obtain resources, and how to find their way home. Researchers from a wide range of disciplines, including neuroscience, cognition, and sociology, have discovered a great deal about how humans and other animals sense, interpret, behave in, and communicate about space. This book addresses some of the most important dimensions of spatial cognition, such as neuroscience, perception, memory, and language. It provides a broad yet detailed overview that is useful not only to academics, practitioners, and advanced students of psychology, but also to city planners, architects, software designers, sociologists, and anyone else who seeks to understand how we perceive, interpret, and interact with the world around us.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/13936-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distances between two locations are overestimated if they are separated by a barrier or boundary.

    “For example, distances between two locations are overestimated if they are separated by a barrier or boundary (such as state borders), and angles of intersections are remembered as being closer to 90 degrees 138 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [138]

  • Angles of intersections are remembered as being closer to 90 degrees.

    “and angles of intersections are remembered as being closer to 90 degrees 138 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [138]

  • Findings from spatial cognition studies in humans show that semantic knowledge and language cues exert a powerful influence on human spatial judgements and may contribute to spatial schemas.

    “As mentioned in the section on regionalization of space, findings from spatial cognition studies in humans show that semantic knowledge and language cues exert a powerful influence on human spatial judgements 29,138 and may contribute to spatial schemas.”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [138]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Published
2013
OpenAlex
W579876315
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.79
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Keywords
spatial cognition, spatial perception, spatial memory, spatial language, spatial navigation, spatial representation, animal cognition, environmental knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review