The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This follows the Bradley-Terry model (Bradley and Terry, 1952) for estimating score functions from pairwise preferences, and is the specialization of the Luce-Shephard choice rule (Luce, 2005; Shepard, 1957) to preferences over trajectory segments.”
From Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences (2017) · cites this paper as Luce, 2005
In the citing paper
“Research into human choice suggests that both explicit and implicit choices systematically vary based on context, especially the other options that are present when choosing [56–59].”
From Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Payne, J. W. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2 · Cited by 1,974
Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.93 · Cited by 1,696
Coombs, C. H. (1960) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047773 · Cited by 1,568
Metadata
- Authors
- Luce, R. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Luce, R. Duncan
- Venue
- Dover Publications eBooks
- Publisher
- Dover Publications
- Published
- 2005
- OpenAlex
- W2094536313
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 20.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dover Publications eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (NSF-G2803)
- Office of Naval Research (G-4506)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- decision-making, choice theory, consumer behavior, utility maximization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
