The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new mode of fear expression: perceptual bias in height fear
Open accessAbstract
Emotion and psychopathology researchers have described the fear response as consisting of four main components--subjective affect, physiology, cognition, and behavior. The current study provides evidence for an additional component in the domain of height fear (perception) and shows that it is distinct from measures of cognitive processing. Individuals High (N = 35) and Low (N = 36) in acrophobic symptoms looked over a two-story balcony ledge and estimated its vertical extent using a direct height estimation task (visual matching), and an indirect task (size estimation); the latter task seems to exhibit little influence from cognitive factors. In addition, implicit and explicit measures of cognitive processing were obtained. Results indicated that, as expected, the High Fear group showed greater relative, implicit height fear associations and explicit threat cognitions. Of primary interest, the High (compared to Low) Fear group estimated the vertical extent to be higher, and judged target sizes to be greater, even when controlling for the cognitive bias measures. These results suggest that emotional factors such as fear are related to perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, when asked to stand on a balcony, height-fearful individuals more strongly endorsed experiencing thoughts related to danger (e.g., “The railing will not protect me”) and their inability to cope with anxiety (“I will be paralyzed by fear”), compared to low fear participants (Clerkin et al., 2009; Teachman et al., 2008).”
From Cognitive processing and acrophobia: validating the Heights Interpretation Questionnaire (2011) · cites this paper as Teachman et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Consistent with past research (e.g., Clerkin et al., 2009; Menzies & Clark, 1995; Teachman et al., 2008), the current studies demonstrate that height fearful individuals interpret heights to be dangerous and they doubt their ability to cope with their anxiety.”
From Cognitive processing and acrophobia: validating the Heights Interpretation Questionnaire (2011) · cites this paper as Teachman et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916 · Cited by 2,100
A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotional Imagery
Lang, P. J. (1979) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x · Cited by 1,750
Chambless, D. L., Caputo, G. C., Bright, P., & Gallagher, R. (1984) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.52.6.1090 · Cited by 1,247
A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy
Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. (1964) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(64)90051-8 · Cited by 1,027
Emotion Facilitates Perception and Potentiates the Perceptual Benefits of Attention
Phelps, E. A., Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x · Cited by 869
Visual space perception and visually directed action.
Loomis, J. M., Silva, J. A. D., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.906 · Cited by 705
Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action
Proffitt, D. R. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x · Cited by 696 · cited 4×
“The current hypothesis that nonoptical factors, like fear, may be related to visual perception draws on recent studies demonstrating that perceived spatial layout is influenced by the physiological state of the observer (see Proffitt, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialVisual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.
Bhalla, M., & Proffítt, D. R. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1076 · Cited by 647
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Barlow DH. Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000965 · Cited by 1,200
Fear Generalization in Humans: Systematic Review and Implications for Anxiety Disorder Research
Dymond, S., Dunsmoor, J. E., Vervliet, B., Roche, B. T., & Hermans, D. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.10.001 · Cited by 542
Emotion and perception: the role of affective information
Zadra, J. R., & Clore, G. L. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.147 · Cited by 397
Nieuwenhuys, A., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2012) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0384-x · Cited by 265
How to Measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist
Touré‐Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. (2014) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12110 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Teachman, B. A., Stefanucci, J. K., Clerkin, E. M., Cody, M. W., & Proffitt, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- William & Mary (US)
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-301
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- PMC
- PMC3182306
- OpenAlex
- W2012276805
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (RO1MH075781-01A2)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- acrophobia, perceptual bias, fear expression, stature estimation, size estimation, emotion and perception, cognitive biases
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Altitude, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Distance Perception, Fear, Female, Humans, Individuality, Judgment, Male, Orientation, Perceptual Distortion, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review